Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise
Explanation:
When the Articles of Confederation underwent revision, there were many issues that were discussed. One of the major issues was the debate over the the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise. According to the Great Compromise, an equal right was to be distributed among the citizens to choose the representatives.
In the Three-Fifths Compromise, no debates were initiated on the issue of the complete abolition of slavery and granting them the citizenship. The slaves were agreed to be counted to be the three-fifth of the individual who were liable for taxation and representation.
1) the central government could not collect debts from the states
2) 9 states needed to approve congressional legislation
3)all 13 colonies needed to amend the Articles
<span>4) the central government could not raise revenue</span>
Hope I Helped You!!! :-)
Have A Good Day!!!
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Disappointed by this apparent out of line treatment, ranchers swung to gatherings, for example, the Populist Party to endeavor to address their. Agriculturists had issues with the railways in the late 1800s. The agriculturists trusted they weren't being dealt with decently or similarly by the railroad organizations.
The issues confronting the agriculturist of the late nineteenth Century were wide. They extended from falling harvest costs, to uncalled for treatment by the railways, and furthermore the battle to have silver instituted as cash, in exertion to expand the estimation of a dollar.
Agriculturists trusted that loan fees were too high on account of monopolistic moneylenders, and the cash supply was deficient, delivering emptying. A falling cost dimension expanded the genuine weight of obligation, as ranchers reimbursed advances with dollars worth essentially more than those they had acquired.
the united states solution i believe was the best because they were able to keep themselves up enough to last to world war 2 when they started to increase jobs because they had to build war machines like ships and tanks ect and since they had to do it fast they had to hire more people instead of some of the other countries how lessened the value of their money such as great Britain
