You didn't give the options. However, i'll try.
To me, a stone cannot be ethical because it cannot suffer. Indeed, the capacity for suffering must be satisfied before we talk about interest in a meaningful way. For instance, nothing we could possibly do for a stone could make a difference in its welfare. It don't have interest. Whereas, we, humans have interest. Therefore we can be ethical because we are sentient beings that can be benifited or harmed. It's because we can experience pain as a result.
Hope this helps !
Photon
I feel like it is the 2nd sentence
Explanation:
the second sentence makes much more sense that the others. Hope this helps....Fighting!
Answer:
a pro sportsman is a really hard job and takes a really long time to catch something also there might be bigger fish that can probably harm you or you can even start sinking so i would say no my opinion:)
Explanation:
