All categories

3 years ago

Would you rather be a juvenile prosecutor or defense attorney? Explain your decision.

Business

1 answer:

balandron [24]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

a defense attorney instead

Explanation:

From a financial standpoint, a defense attorney would more likely make more money than a juvenile prosecutor because a defense attorney could charge up more for certain cases than been a juvenile prosecutor who wants to ensure someone is convicted.

Also, in terms of purpose, I do feel a defense lawyer could make more impact socially by defending his or her clients.

You might be interested in

_____ power derives from a position of authority inside the organization and is sometimes referred to as formal authority.

julsineya [31]

The appropriate response is legitimate power. Legitimate power will be the power you get from your formal position or office held in the association's progressive system of an expert. For instance, the leader of a company has certain forces in view of the workplace he holds in the enterprise.

5 0

3 years ago

Fickel Company has two manufacturing departments—Assembly and Testing & Packaging. The predetermined overhead rates in Assem

Archy [21]

Answer:

Instructions are listed below.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

The predetermined overhead rates:

Assembly= $22 per direct labor-hour

Testing & Packaging= $18.00 per direct labor-hour

The company’s direct labor wage rate is $24.00 per hour.

Job N-60:

Assembly:

Direct materials $390

Direct labor $228

Testing & Packaging:

Direct materials $45

Direct labor $132

1) To calculate the total manufacturing cost, first, we need to allocate overhead. To do that, we need direct labor hours for each department.

Assembly:

Direct labor hours= 228/24= 9.5

Testing:

Direct labor hour= 132/24= 5.5

Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base

Allocated MOH= 22*9.5 + 18*5.5= $308

Total manufacturing cost= direct material + direct labor + allocated overhead

Total manufacturing cost= (390 + 45) + (228 + 132) + (308)= $1,103

2) Unitary cost= 1,103/10= $110.3

6 0

3 years ago

10. Crowding out effect Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of $13 billion raises the total deman

Lilit [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

Effect of crowding out:

The crowding out phenomena describes the economic phenomena in which an increase in government public spending leads to reduced or perhaps may eliminate of private investment.

Multiplier:

The multiplier represents the ratio of income to investment change.

Given that:

$13 billion increase in government spending will lead to a $52 billion

The rise in demand for goods & service will be the value of multiplier which is

= 52/13

= 4

To determine the multiplier using the formula:

Multiplier = 1 /( 1- MPC)

4 = 1/(1 - MPC)

4 (1 - MPC) = 1

(1- MPC) = 1/4

-MPC = 0.25 - 1

MPC = 0.75

Marginal propensity to consume = 0.75

6 0

3 years ago

Why should policies that attempt to create a ladder of opportunity be carried out in the spirit of open-mindedness? Select all t

OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

b. Such policies have the potential to equalize society.

Explanation:

Open mindedness policy means giving fair and equal opportunity to all and sundry without being bias. When considering open mindedness policy, information is shared to everyone without considering race, religion background or educational qualifications.

Open mindedness accepts people from diverse background and tends to listen first before judging. It also consider opinions from all side without segregation. Although this is the right thing expected but the result is usually not the case.

Unlike close mindednes which restrict information thereby limiting opportunities, open mindedness helps one to learn, unlearn, relearn and grow. It also comes with being honest-thats who you are.

Thus when policy is enacted on open mindedness, it has potentials to equalize the society.

4 0

3 years ago

A company is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment for $117,200. Predicted annual cash inflows from this investme

monitta

Answer:

3.79 years

Explanation:

In the payback, we analyze in how many years the invested amount is recovered. The computation is shown below:

In year 0 = $117,200

In year 1 = $53,000

In year 2 = $21,500

In year 3 = $26,500

In year 4 = $20,500

In year 5 = $23,000

If we sum the first 3 year cash inflows than it would be $101,000

Now we deduct the $101,000 from the $117,200 , so the amount would be $16,200 as if we added the fourth year cash inflow so the total amount exceed to the initial investment. So, we deduct it

And, the next year cash inflow is $20,500

So, the payback period equal to

= 3 years + $16,200 ÷ $20,500

= 3.79 years

In 3.79 years, the invested amount is recovered.

8 0

3 years ago