1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
likoan [24]
3 years ago
15

What does the federal provision for "incidental uses and disclosures" mean? Accidental uses and disclosures are not subject to p

enalties provided reasonable safeguards are in place and there has been no negligence. Accidental uses and disclosures are never subject to penalties in treatment contexts, even if there is negligence. Accidental uses and disclosures are not subject to penalties provided reasonable administrative, physical, and technical safeguards are in place?
Business
1 answer:
Harman [31]3 years ago
6 0

I believe the answer is:  Accidental uses and disclosures are not subject to penalties provided reasonable safeguards are in place and there has been no negligence.

The purpose for such disclosures is to  that ensure that the patients could receive prompt and effective health care. This could only be done as long as the establishment  provided appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards that does not further violate their privacy.

You might be interested in
Sales is $90 per unit; direct material is $30 per unit; direct labor is $12 per unit; overhead is $5 per unit and $2,100 per mon
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:

$10

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Luke is the type of leader that concentrates on relationships as he leads and not just tasks. According to fiedler’s contingency
elena55 [62]

Luke is the type of leader that concentrates on relationships as he leads and not just tasks. Luke is an LPC type of leader.

Option A high - LPC leader.

Fiedler's Contingency Theory of Leadership is a good reminder that leadership isn't a one-size-fits-all approach. It's possible that just because your team isn't functioning as well as it should, you aren't a competent leader. Instead, your natural leadership style might not be the best fit for your team's current demands.

You are more relationship-oriented if you rank your least favorite coworker positively on a range of different parameters. You are more task-oriented if you judge them less positively on the same criteria.

Essentially:

You're a relationship-oriented leader if you have a high LPC rating.

You're a task-oriented leader if you have a low LPC.

Building relationships, creating team cohesion, and managing interpersonal conflict are all skills that relationship-oriented leaders excel at. Task-oriented leaders are good at coordinating projects and teams to get things done quickly and efficiently.

Disclaimer: The question was incomplete. Please find the full content below.

Question: Luke is the type of leader that concentrates on relationships as he leads and not just tasks. According to Fiedler’s Contingency Model, Luke is what type of leader?

A) A moderate-LPC leader

B) An adequate-LPC leader

C) A high-LPC leader

D) A low-LPC leader

Learn more about relationships at

brainly.com/question/10286547

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
John's Locomotive Works manufactures a model locomotive. It comes in two versions: a standard (X1) and a deluxe (X2). The locomo
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

Explanation:

X1                    X2              Z

0                      0                0

16                     0                 4,000

0                      10                3,500

8                       6                 4,100

check the picture attached for more explanation

3 0
3 years ago
What do you understand by marketing mix​
k0ka [10]

Explanation:

When I think about the term marketing mix, I think about a set of tools that firms use to increase their profits such as price, product, promotion and place.

3 0
3 years ago
Henry is a landlord renting an apartment to​ Steven, a student at a nearby university. The two enter into a​ one-year lease arra
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

Mitigate his damages

Explanation:

By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do economists call the physical things that firms make (things that can be seen or touched)?
    11·1 answer
  • In 2015, government spending was $3.80 trillion, tax revenue was $4.50 trillion, GDP was $14.12 trillion, and total consumer spe
    15·1 answer
  • If you enter the teaching profession, you will have no money for vacations; and if you do not enter the teaching profession, you
    14·1 answer
  • Interest groups may use ________ in mass-circulation magazines, newspapers, and television to improve their standing in the comm
    5·1 answer
  • "The Talley Corporation had taxable operating income of $345,000 (i.e., earnings from operating revenues minus all operating cos
    14·1 answer
  • Shana continues to buy a necessary medicine even though prices for the medicine rise sharply. Shana's behavior shows howa. the p
    7·1 answer
  • Producers often work to maximize their and make them as large as possible. True or False
    8·2 answers
  • On April 30, 1990, April purchased a $1,000 10% par-value seven-year bond having semiannual coupons; these were payable at the e
    13·1 answer
  • Company Name: XXX XXX Coffee Co
    10·1 answer
  • Crane Company received proceeds of $799000 on 10-year, 9% bonds issued on January 1, 2019. The bonds had a face value of $848000
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!