<span><span>1.) The power to financially support public schools.
</span><span>2.)The power to maintain the Federal Reserve Board.
</span><span>3.) The power to prohibit discrimination in restaurants, hotels, and other public accomodations.
</span><span>4.) The power to draft people into the armed services.
</span><span>5.) The power to establish a minimum wage.
</span><span>6.) The power to monitor air and water pollution.
</span><span>7.) The power to limit the number of immigrants to the U.S.
</span><span>8.) The power to regulate monopolies and other practices which limit competition.
</span></span>
sorry to hear that, hope ya have fun cleaning it up
It lies in the fact that the senior party to any relationship provided land and oversight to the junior party’s who in turn was expected to provide his lord with economic and military support.
I think the difference is caused by a person or group actually going through with genocide versus an attempt at it, but that's just my best guess?
