The answer is;
Artificial satellites.
Hope this helps!!! :):)
1717 Málaga, Spain and he died 1793
Answer: <em>Science shows that animals experience pleasure and pain, and so those experiences should be considered when reasoning about moral actions.</em>
Explanation:
According to Utilitarianism which believes that the ends justifies the means if the ends are for the good of the society in general, the personal experiences of individuals must be noteworthy. That when moral decisions are made, individuals who have experienced pleasure or pain should have their interests taken into account.
With this in mind and with science showing that animals can experience both pleasure and pain the theory supports they should not be discriminated against when making decisions. Actions should involve considerations for both animals and humans alike because animals like humans, experience pleasure and pain.
By 1796, both the Federalist and Republican parties were well-developed and going strong. Neither party was particularly well organized, but each was strong and fought fiercely for what it believed in.
The Federalist Party was born in the 1790s and became associated with President George Washington, despite the fact that Washington avoided dealing in partisan activities. This party believed that the United States had much to learn from Great Britain and that the government should be modeled after the government of England. It wanted a strong, centralized bank and a federal constitution.
The Republic Party already existed when the Federalist Party was formed. Republicans believed that any relationship with Great Britain would result in America always being under the smaller country's "thumb." This party wanted complete independence and believed that by giving states power, it would be creating a better relationship with the federal government, thus making the country better able to care for its people. The Federalist Party did not last very long and the Republican Party of today has no ties with the Republican Party of the 1700s.
Answer:Primates are characterized by relatively late ages at first reproduction, long lives and low fertility. Together, these traits define a life-history of reduced reproductive effort. Understanding the optimal allocation of reproductive effort, and specifically reduced reproductive effort, has been one of the key problems motivating the development of life history theory. Because of their unusual constellation of life-history traits, primates play an important role in the continued development of life history theory. In this review, I present the evidence for the reduced reproductive effort life histories of primates and discuss the ways that such life-history tactics are understood in contemporary theory. Such tactics are particularly consistent with the predictions of stochastic demographic models, suggesting a key role for environmental variability in the evolution of primate life histories. The tendency for primates to specialize in high-quality, high-variability food items may make them particularly susceptible to environmental variability and explain their low reproductive-effort tactics. I discuss recent applications of life history theory to human evolution and emphasize the continuity between models used to explain peculiarities of human reproduction and senescence with the long, slow life histories of primates more generally.
Explanation:
