1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
crimeas [40]
3 years ago
14

A customer subscribes to a $10,000 limited partnership interest. The comission is $1,000. The up-front costs are $500 for legal

expenditures, and $500 for organization costs. What is the customer's beginning tax basis?
a. $10,000
b. $9,500
c. $9,000
d. $8,000
Business
1 answer:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

(A) $10,000

Explanation:

The beginning of the partnership basis for tax purposes consists of all the money paid to the partnership which is $10, 000. The comission fee $1,000, the up-front costs which are $500 for legal expenditures, and $500 for organization costs are all included in the $10000 price and are integral part of the beginning basis. There are no up front deductions for these costs.

Adjustments to the beginning basis will occur after the partnership's first year of operations. At that point, a K-1 is issued, showing that partner's share of partnership income and loss; and any cash distributions made by the partnership or additional cash contributions made to the partnership. All of these items are netted against the beginning basis to arrive at the year-end adjusted basis. So the customer's beginning tax basis is $10,000.

You might be interested in
tulip Co. owns 100% of Daisy Co.'s outstanding common stock. Tulip's cost of goods sold for the year totals $600,000, and Daisy'
olasank [31]

Answer:

Cost of goods sold to be reported in  consolidated financial statement = $1,000,000

Explanation:

Whenever there is 100% or more than 50% holding in a company, then equity method is followed under which all of the items are to be consolidated, but in case where there are inter transfers that is transfer from holding to subsidiary or vice-versa then such transactions, profit not realized is to be eliminated.

In case where inventory is transferred to subsidiary after adding profit by holding company, then in case if that inventory is sold to third party by year end then entire profit is recognized even the profit added by holding to cost of goods sold to subsidiary.

Where in case such inventory is not sold further by subsidiary to third party and is still held in the stock then such profit added on sale by holding to subsidiary is eliminated.

In our case the entire inventory is sold to third party by the year end.

Therefore, entire profit will be recognized and cost of goods sold to be shown in consolidated financial statements = $600,000 + $400,000 = $1,000,000.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you agree with the​ argument? Should the government treat kidneys like other goods and allow the market to determine​ price?
kow [346]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

The market should determine the price of goods and services only. The commercialization of human organs would increase the existing social inequality. This is because poor people would only be able to sell their organs, meaning they would not have the ability to buy a kidney if they needed it. On the other hand, it would increase the sale of kidneys for material survival itself, which is morally reprehensible.

8 0
3 years ago
Jacob Corcoran bought 10,000 shares of Grebe Corporation stock two years ago for $24,000. Last year, Jacob received a nontaxable
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

Jacob purchased 10000 shares form Grebe corporation two years ago for $24000

last year Jacob received a non taxable stock dividend of 2000 shares from Grebe corporation

In the current year tax year Jacob sold all stock received as dividend that's 2000 shares for $18000

The gain of the sale of 2000 shares can be calculated by subtracting the basis in the shares from the cost price. the cost of shares = ( $24000 / 12000 ) = $2 per share

profit made from the sales of 2000 shares is calculated as follows ; selling price ( $18000 ) - cost price of 2000 shares ( $2 * 2000) , the profit is $14000 and it is in the long term because the original shares bought has been held for at least 1 year

Explanation:

Jacob purchased 10000 shares form Grebe corporation two years ago for $24000

last year Jacob received a non taxable stock dividend of 2000 shares from Grebe corporation

In the current year tax year Jacob sold all stock received as dividend that's 2000 shares for $18000

The gain of the sale of 2000 shares can be calculated by subtracting the basis in the shares from the cost price. the cost of shares = ( $24000 / 12000 ) = $2 per share

profit made from the sales of 2000 shares is calculated as follows ; selling price ( $18000 ) - cost price of 2000 shares ( $2 * 2000) , the profit is $14000 and it is in the long term because the original shares bought has been held for at least 1 year

8 0
3 years ago
Delta Construction Corporation, a general contractor, hires Eagle Electrical Company, a subcontractor, to wire a new office buil
nignag [31]

Answer: excused by Delta's failure to pay.

Explanation:

Delta Construction Corporation hires Eagle Electrical Company, as a subcontractor, to wire its new office building. After the completion of the work, Eagles is owed more than $50000.

Eagle's suspension of work is most likely due to the excuse by Delta's failure to pay. Delta has a right to pay up the money owed to Eagle. Lack of payment can lead to court cases.

3 0
3 years ago
Lusk Corporation produces and sells 10,000 units of Product X each month. The selling price of Product X is $40 per unit, and va
melisa1 [442]

Answer:

There is a financial disadvantage of ($30,000).

Explanation:

The discontinuity of product X would result in the contribution lost.

Sales that would be lost = $40 × 10,000 units = $400,000

Relevant variable cost with the production of product X that would be saved = $32 × 10,000 units = $320,000

Contribution lost = Sales lost - Variable cost saved

Contribution lost = $400,000 - $320,000

Contribution lost = $80,000

Saving in fixed costs = $120,000 - $70,000 (this would not be incurred) = $50,000

However, still contribution lost is more than the saving in fixed costs

Therefore, the financial disadvantage = $80,000 - $50,000 = ($30,000)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements is CORRECT? a. The WACC that should be used in capital budgeting is the firm's marginal, after
    7·1 answer
  • If variable manufacturing overhead is applied on the basis of direct labor-hours and the variable overhead rate variance is favo
    5·1 answer
  • Acme Manufacturing Company’s controller was classifying costs for the most recent financial statement period. Which of the follo
    7·1 answer
  • If the interest rate is 8%, what is the 4-year discount factor? What is the 4-year annuity factor? What is the relationship betw
    5·1 answer
  • For Wilton Company, the predetermined overhead rate is 70% of direct labor cost. During the month, $360,000 of factory labor cos
    9·2 answers
  • Sophia Martin's goal has been to travel around the world. She has now been traveling for six months and she has decided she is a
    8·1 answer
  • n spreadsheet programs, labels and constant values are always copied exactly to the new location; what happens to formulas when
    10·1 answer
  • Suppose all firms follow similar financing policies, face similar risks, have equal access to capital, and operate in competitiv
    5·2 answers
  • General partners must obtain approval from a majority of the limited partners in order to manage the business. True or False
    5·1 answer
  • What is one key difference between payday loans and title loans?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!