1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
monitta
4 years ago
9

what could brutus have done to give a more effective speech? write two paragraphs that describe that describe his use of persuas

ive appeals, comparing and contrasting with the speech antony gave. provide specific examples from the text to support your point. use proper spelling and grammar.
English
1 answer:
tino4ka555 [31]4 years ago
7 0
Though Brutus’ speech was logical and concise and he thought that the crowd would rally to his cause, he failed to gain. Brutus was demanded the people to listen hear him.  He tried to win the people over and support through logical explanations.  He listed down the reasons for killing Caesar and was very concise in his speech as he believed the truth will convince the people and rally to his cause.  The problem was the people didn’t connect with his arguments and he was too aloof in his approach that he failed to gain their support and he should make a speech wherein he had a personal connection with the crowd.Anthony on the other hand asked the people to hear him.  His agreement of the senate’s actions was for the subtle purpose of discrediting all that they said.  Listing down the achievements of Caesar, he was all manipulating the crowd by appealing to their emotion.  As he made his speech, he was crying and this moved the crowd enabling him to win them over.  Anthony was the better orator because of his use of emotion and facts.<span>
</span>
You might be interested in
If Kitty were a person instead of a diary, Anne Frank might expect to receive a response. How might a friend respond to Anne in
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

same

Explanation:

bro

i care about your ela

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help me with formal writing.
Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

There were a lot of people at the museum

Oscar started to worry about the test

When the cops arrived, the criminal ran outside

He checked his cell phone for any messages

4 0
3 years ago
Can you please help me out with the ones im missing thank u this will be 20 poins\ts
sashaice [31]
Can’t see the picture
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
THE TOP TEN: WRITE 10 TIPS TO SUCCESSFULLY WIN A PANEL DISCUSSION. (HELP ME ILL MARK U AS A BRAINLIEST)
Ahat [919]

10 Tips to Improve Panel Discussions

  • Carefully choose moderators and panelists .
  • Interesting and articulate panelists are also important.
  • Get rid of the long, draped table.
  • Stress preparation.
  • Formal rehearsals are unnecessary; however the moderator should brief panelists on the process and ground rules for the session.
  • Structure the discussion to be more like a conversation.
  • Limit the number of slides.
  • Engage the audience early.
  • Encourage participation.
  • Make it entertaining

—https://www.smartmeetings.com/meeting-planning/91957/10-tips-to-improve-panel-discussions

4 0
3 years ago
In his journals, William Bradford used third person pronouns to describe the life and hardships of the puritans as they sought t
REY [17]

Answer:

The Pilgrims (Plymouth Colony)

Writing in "The Pilgrims," his personal journals, Bradford William used the third person point of view to veil the narrator-participant as an ordinary observer. This literary device makes the reader to identify with the characters, thus enhancing the story's believability and objectivity.  This contrasts with writing from the first or second person's points of view, which shows the narrator's active involvement, thereby increasing subjectivity while obscuring objectivity in story narration.

By writing from this third person point of view, using third person pronouns, William Bradford, separated himself from the plot of the story.  Thus, he remained an observer-narrator and not an active participant. At the same time, since it is widely known that Bradford was the founder of the Plymouth Colony, Bradford shows his bias by isolating himself totally from the story, by writing with the third person pronouns.

Explanation:  

According to history, William Bradford (1590-1657) was one of the founding fathers of the Plymouth Colony and its governor for 30 years.  Single-handedly, Bradford drafted the legal code for the Plymouth Colony which facilitated the building of a Puritan-based community in the state of Massachusetts, one of the 6 New England states.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Postmodern manifestos definition
    14·1 answer
  • How are the two arguments made in the passages different?
    12·2 answers
  • Name five and describe fully the advantages of cass for abet learners
    8·1 answer
  • A chemist, environmental specialist, and physicist all
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement about the narrator is correct?
    6·2 answers
  • 17. Which of these is a collective noun? (1 point)<br> colony<br> dogs<br> them<br> cows
    14·1 answer
  • Which sentence does NOT use a gerund?
    12·2 answers
  • I NEED HELP NOW
    14·2 answers
  • What would make a blog post about a rare Egyptian musical instrument easier to understand?
    10·2 answers
  • Helpppp meeeeee plizzzzzz
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!