1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kykrilka [37]
3 years ago
8

Please Help!!! I have the answer I just need a step by step explanation. I will give extra points and make you brainiest!!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
jasenka [17]3 years ago
6 0

Here’s how to get the answer written out!

You might be interested in
Click to see all PLS HELP I KNOW ITS LATE HURRY!​
fiasKO [112]

Answer: 9.5/10 mile long

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Javen and Andrew
Tasya [4]

Answer:

joven has 21 and Andrew has 16

Step-by-step explanation:

37-5=32

32/2=16= andrew b/c he has 5 fewer

16+5=21=Joven b/c he has 5 more

7 0
3 years ago
What is the sum of the finite arthemetic series (-10)+0+10+20....+130
Ganezh [65]
That would be 20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,100,110,120,130.    200,150,300,250     
650 + 250 = so the answer would be 900.
4 0
4 years ago
Number 17 pls help me it’s my last question plss
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
The world population was 2560 million people in 1950 and 3040 million in 1960 and can be modeled by the function p(t) 2560e0.017
almond37 [142]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The average rate of change is the slope.  However, since this is not a linear function but an exponential one, we cannot determine the slope of the function, only the slope of the secant line that connects the x-values of 4 and 8.  In order to do that we need to find the corresponding y-coordinate that goes with each of those x-values and plug them into the slope function.  What we will get is a very loose interpretation of the rate of change of population, but that's all we have short of using calculus.  It would be a closer estimation if we looked at x values of 4 and 5, or eve 4 ad 4.5.  But that's not what we're being asked.  So let's get to it.

Sub first 4 in for x and then 8, to get each y value:

P(4)=2560e^{(.017185)(4)} to get that P(4) = 2742.16

P(8)=2560e^{(.017185)(8)} to get that P(8) = 2937.29

The coordinates for these are (4, 2742.16) and (8, 2937.29)

Plug into the slope formula:

m=\frac{2937.29-2742.16}{8-4} which gives you, in decimal form rounded to the nearest hundredth,

48.78 million.

The interpretation of this value in our situation is that between 1954 and 1958 the population increased 48.78 million people per year.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Two students compared the scores on their math tests. Their results on 9 tests are shown in the box plots below. Compare the box
    8·2 answers
  • 4x³ 2x² + x - 5) multiply the polynomials and simplify​
    5·1 answer
  • HELLPPPPPPPPPPP PLEASE
    15·1 answer
  • 3 squared 3 times 32 plus 12 divided into 4 =
    5·2 answers
  • Find the solution by graphing or from the graph y=x2+7x+6
    8·1 answer
  • Help plz. using trig to find angles
    6·1 answer
  • Simplify 2(4x-3)-3(5-x)
    8·2 answers
  • Sarah kept track of the points she scored during her first five basketball games in the table shown. easy help
    13·1 answer
  • A park is in the shape of a rectangle 36 kilometers long and 27 kilometers wide. If you walk diagonally across the park, how far
    10·1 answer
  • Who is piplup ???????? ~ <br><br><br><br>​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!