Answer:
me if thats alright !!:) thanks
The correct answer is the Public Company Accounting Oversity Board.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in 2002. It’s purpose was to protect investors and add additional oversight for corporations after a number of companies were caught up in accounting scandals and investors lost billions of dollars.
Answer:
Cost of land = $76,240
Explanation:
Cost of land = cash price + accrued taxes + attorney's fees + broker's commission + clearing and grading
Cost of land = $61,440 + $4,720 + $2,660 + $3,360 + $4,060
Cost of land = $76,240
- Original cost is the total price associated with the purchase of an asset.
- The original cost of an asset takes into consideration all of the items that can be attributed to its purchase and to putting the asset to use.
- These costs include the purchase price and such factors as commissions, transportation, appraisals, warranties and installation and testing.
- Original cost can be used to value an asset type, including equipment, real estate and security instruments.
Answer:
a. nearshore outsourcing
Explanation:
Nearshore outsourcing is a business practice related to transferring certain activities and services to people and organizations in neighboring countries.
Since Canada and Mexico are neighboring countries of the US, this is nearshore outsourcing. On the other hand, offshore outsourcing is a type of outsourcing that transfers the activities on to farther countries. In this example, offshore countries would be India or Ukraine.
Answer:
1. I feel like Pat's new strategy isn't ethical. Pat doesn't pay for the suits; he just buys them and then returns them. Pat benefits, but the store he gets the suits from doesn't. In fact, they are harmed from this transaction because they are unable to have the suit for others to buy while Pat has it. There could be consequences with this strategy. For example, the suit might be damaged, and Pat won't be able to return it. Another problem is that others might find out about Pat's strategy, and they might view them as unprofessional. This is a problem for Pat since the reason Pat wore those suits was to look professional.
2. The stores are harmed from this transaction. They are unable to sell the suits to other buyers. The stores lose potential customers, so the stores lose potential money.
3. The companies should record that Pat had bought the suit only to return it the next day, so that they can act accordingly when Pat or someone else comes back to "buy" a suit.
Explanation:
