Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Complainants, enforcing the contract.
Explanation:
The Lucy Vs Zehmer case was one of decision on if a contract was binding or not on the basis of the undisclosed intentions of the parties involved in the contract. Zehmer alleged that he had jokingly sold and transferred title to Lucy while drunk. However the court ruled that contract for the sale of land to Lucy was valid on the basis that the secret intentions of Zehmer was not known or disclosed in the sale of the land and only his actions count for the contract to be binding.
Answer: Oligopolistic
Explanation:
The oligopolistic industry is one of the type of market structure where the small industries or the companies are compete with each other and earning the various types of economical profits.
The main purpose of this type of industry is that it help[s in reducing the competition in the market and also control the market share function.
According to the given scenario, the magical production is one of the type of large production organization and this company perform various types of functioning in the Oligopolistic industry.
Therefore, Oligopolistic is the correct answer.
Answer:
a. $8,200
Explanation:
The same accounting principles would be applied to non-profit entities while recording their assets as applied to other entities.
Non-profit entity would record its assets at fair value same as assets are recorded by other entities.
Answer: D. Common stock
Explanation:
Common stock refers to the security which represents ownership in a corporation.
The entry to record the issuance of 150 shares of $5 par common stock at par to an attorney in payment of legal fees for organizing a corporation includes a credit to the common stock.
Answer: Option A
Explanation: Common stockholders refers to the holders of common equity of an organisation. These shareholders are actually the owners of the organisation. They have the potential to earn maximum benefit and bear the maximum risk.
They have the right to select the auditor and board of directors but they cannot interfere with the management decisions. This right stands in the domain of the top managers which are appointed by these shareholders.
Thus, we can conclude that the correct option is A .
