<span>The legislation has good knowledge of issues and philosophies.</span><span>Because of this, it gained a better understanding of the needed programs to address social concerns.</span>
There are many cases before that served as a basis for development and understanding of today's jurisdiction. The improvements were a sign of continuous theory and practice of philosophies in real situations which helped on having a better legislation today.
Answer:
Longitudinal research
Explanation:
Longitudinal research is research that is based on a long period. In this research, the information or the data is collected on the bases of a period of the same population. This period is extended over time. The cohort studies are common in medicine, psychology, and sociology many psychologists conducted a study based on longitudinal. There are many examples like Canadian study conducted on population.
Thus here Dr. Mitchell has conducted a research study on temperament. He has conducted a research study on temperament that is longitudinal research.
The correct answer is C. The Latin American countries demanded self-government from Spain and Portugal.
Explanation
Since the discovery of America in 1492 the conquest and colonization process of this territory began by the Spanish and Portuguese. Later, in the 16th century, the intellectual movement of the Enlightenment started in Europe in which intellectuals proposed models of government different from the monarchy because they thought that the king had a lot of power in it. This triggered the abolition of the monarchy in France and the American War of Independence. These processes inspired Latin American leaders such as Simón Bolivar and José de San Martín to lead the patriotic armies to achieve the independence of the colonies and shape countries. Therefore, the correct answer is C. The Latin American countries demanded self-government from Spain and Portugal.
The Constitution leaves a lot of space for personal interpretation, which means different people can view the document in different ways and to different degrees. For example, one may say, something that isn't stated in the Constitution means the government shouldn't do it. This is called strict interpretation of the Constitution. However, someone else may say that there wasn't anything in the Constitution prohibiting it. These differences have played a role in the formation of political parties. Hope this helps! :)
