If an archaeologist discovers new evidence suggesting that humans inhabited an area before it was believed to have been inhabited, the archaeologist must first critically evaluate the work of other archaeologists who argue otherwise.
In this way, the archaeologist would be able to find points of agreement and disagreement in research already carried out to proceed with his study and then carry out additional tests on the evidence found.
<h3 /><h3>Importance of the scientific method</h3>
The scientific method is a set of rules that must be followed to produce proven scientific knowledge. Therefore, the method provides value and reliability to the research, protecting the researcher's subjectivity.
Therefore, when discovering new evidence about a topic, a researcher must critically evaluate the scientific material already produced to carry out new tests to prove its evidence.
The correct answer is:
- First critically evaluate the work of other archaeologists who argue otherwise.
Find out more information about scientific method here:
brainly.com/question/17216882
Hypocenter depth exceeding 300km.that mostly happen at oceanic continental convergent boundaries association with subducted oceanic lithosphere
Answer:This dermacation is called ethnic boundary
Explanation:
We have categories that we use to define certain ethnic groups sometimes we do this based on characteristics of each group or their nationality or what other association we may have for that group or for our own groups.
Sometimes we use the language or the accent that each person has to say they are African or they are Mexican.
Sometimes its our customs that each group does while the other doesn't do .
Answer:
most
Explanation:
The largest is the superlative form of large that is why I choose most.