1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
3 years ago
9

Although many think of this line as lying only in the United States, it extends from Canada into Central

History
1 answer:
kobusy [5.1K]3 years ago
4 0
D continental divide
You might be interested in
Which European philosopher proposed that dividing the government into three branches would prevent any one person or group from
GaryK [48]
The answer is d i hope this helps you
5 0
3 years ago
We're the domestic effects of the war more positive or negative overall
labwork [276]

Answer:

The domestic effects of the war were more positive than negative overall

Explanation:

the domestic effects of the war were more positive than negative because it boosted research in technology because better transport and means of communication gave countries an advantage over their enemies. The harsh conditions of the Treaty of Versailles caused a lot of dissent in Europe, especially on the side of the Central Powers who had to pay a lot for financial reparations.

5 0
3 years ago
Who were the abolitionists?
Savatey [412]
The correct answer is: the people in the north who said that all African American people should be slaves.
3 0
2 years ago
The drawing of New Orleans below was published in 1867
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer: the answer is B

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
What was the Dawes Act in 1887 meant to do?
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

<u>Integration of Indians in American society</u>

Explanation:

The federal government has almost adopted an act that has further damaged India's interests even more fundamentally. Dawes Act of 1887 intended, to assist the Indians by staying on their land and integrating them into American society. This had a very different effect.

The act laid down the conditions that would give back to the Indians their common rights to their tribal land and instead individual estates of 160 acres (the value of the land was granted by white settlers). Any surplus land in the territory will be sold, and the proceeds will go to the tribes.

This plan was doomed to fail over a short period of time because it was impossible for hunters and warriors to quickly transform into farmers. In the long run, this had the effect of giving the Indians about two-thirds of the 138 million acres of land reserved for them. The energy with which white settlers ransacked free land is clearly evident in Native American territory, first on the reserves.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In a market economy, the decision of WHAT to produce is determined by who?
    12·1 answer
  • Generally speaking, michigan soils developed from which geological source?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was George Washington being elected unanimously important?
    7·2 answers
  • What belief system would have been MOST likely to have traveled from the east to the west during this time?
    5·2 answers
  • Which animal, brought from the Old World during the Columbian Exchange, made hunting for buffalo much easier for Native American
    6·1 answer
  • In the late 1800's and early 1900's, why did most immigrants to the United States settle in urban areas?
    12·2 answers
  • Russia's _____ held back progress in the 1800's.
    14·2 answers
  • Has US foreign policy been a positive or a negative for international diplomacy, since 1980?
    7·1 answer
  • True or False
    12·2 answers
  • HELPPPPPPPPP MEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!