Answer:
FV= $115,928.81
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Monthly deposit= $70
Interest rate= 0.12/12= 0.01
n= 24*12= 288
<u>To calculate the future value, we need to use the following formula:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= monthly deposit
FV= {70*[(1.01^288) - 1]} / 0.01
FV= $115,928.81
Answer:
- 3.21%
Explanation:
In this question, we use the PV formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Future value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 5% = 50
NPER = 34 years - 1 year = 33 year
Rate of interest = 9%
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the present value would be $581.42
Now the return would be
= Sale price + interest - purchase price
= $581.42 + $50 - $652.39
= -$20.97
And, the total return would be
= Return ÷ purchase price
= -$20.97 ÷ $652.39
= - 3.21%
I think the answer is c for this question tbh well yah
Answer: No. It does not violate Title VII if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Cynthia, requested a two-week leave from her employer to go on a religious pilgrimage and that the pilgrimage was not a requirement of her religion, but Cynthia felt it was a calling from God.
Based on the scenario, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave. According to the court, when an employee says that based on his or her religious belief, he or she is required to go to a pilgrimage, the person has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
In this case, her church which is the Roman Catholic didn't call for a pilgrimage as it was her personal choice. Therefore, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
