b. the interest of European nations in creating colonies in North and South America
Explanation:
- Monroe's doctrine was America's policy of opposing European colonialism in America beginning in 1823.
- In 1823, US President James Monroe rebelled against the intervention of European countries on the American continent.
- The doctrine said that further efforts by European states to seize control of any independent state in North or South America would be seen as "a manifestation of a hostile attitude toward the United States."
- At that moment, directed against the interventionist intentions of the Holy Alliance of European Powers towards the former Spanish and Portuguese colonies in South America, that policy later became "America to Americans" and gained a strong national character.
Learn more on Monroe Doctrine on
brainly.com/question/1587206
brainly.com/question/290388
brainly.com/question/1587201
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Based on the excerpt, Paine recommends that Americans refuse to pay taxes to the British government. conduct business without regulations. write a constitution while the chance exists. leave American independence to chance.
Explanation:
The reason that explains why Americans living in the western United States supported the passage of the law in this question is the
"Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882 concern about competition for limited jobs."
This is based on the fact that during this period, the number of Chinese immigrants was increasing in the Western Part of the United States.
Many of these Chinese immigrants are working at a lower rate compared to a typical American and thereby reducing the number of available vacancies for the Americans.
Therefore, due to limited available jobs, many Americans living in the western United States supported the law's passage in this question.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option A. "Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882 concern about competition for limited jobs."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24380381
Critical analysis of the article by Carson, Clayborne. 2005.“To Walk in Dignity: The Montgomery Bus Boycott.” with the method of REEC is described below.
Explanation:
King reads a prepared statement to about 2,500 persons attending mass meetings at Holt Street and First Baptist Churches.
1 He urges “the Negro citizens of Montgomery to return to the busses tomorrow morning on a non-segregated basis.”
2 A Birmingham News account of the meetings reported that he admitted “it is true we got more out of this (boycott) than we went in for. We started out to get modified segregation (on buses) but we got total integration.
3 At six A.M. the following morning King joined E. D. Nixon, Ralph Abernathy, and Glenn Smiley on one of the first integrated buses. During the initial day of desegregated bus seating there were only a few instances of verbal abuse and occasional violence.
4 For more than twelve months now, we, the Negro citizens of Montgomery have been engaged in a non-violent protest against injustices and indignities experienced on city buses Often our movement has been referred to as a boycott movement. The word boycott, however, does not adequately describe the true spirit of our movement. The word boycott is suggestive of merely an economic squeeze devoid of any positive value.
5. We have struggle against tremendous odds to maintain alternative transportation. We have lived under the agony and darkness of Good Friday with the conviction that one day the heightening glow of Easter would emerge on the horizon.
