I believe your answer is (<span>A) justify a war to extend the borders of the United States. I hope this helps! :)
Have a great rest of the day.
</span>
the supreme court was to consist of a chief justice and 5 associate justices. then a federal judge was to preside over a United States district court which would hear admiralty and maritime cases and some other minor cases. Then the middle tier of the judiciary consisted of the United States circuit courts, which would serve as the principal trial courts in the federal system and exercise limited appellate jurisdiction. Two Supreme court justices and local district judge were to preside in circuit courts
The Eastern Churches do not accept the pope's rulings or leadership. They are now known as the Eastern Orthodox Churches. This caused a schism between the Eastern and Western beliefs and churches in the Roman Empire. ... Another difference between the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church is the language
Answer:
Anti-federalists will oppose it.
Explanation:
Anti-federalist wanted the country to be run based on the original draft of the constitution.
One district characteristic of anti-federalists is that they want a weaker federal government. This means that they wanted the states to have a strong autonomy to regulate themselves without interference from the federal government.
Because of this, anti-federalist wouldn't want the federal government to be able to force the states to conform to a certain legislation.
The question below, the Miranda v. Arizona outcome answer is "Should legal counsel always be appointed by the court, or should the citizen accused of a crime have the right to choose the attorney he would like to represent him?"
<u>Answer:</u> Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
The U.S. Supreme Court's turning point resolution was resulted from "Miranda v. Arizona" case in which the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution inhibits prosecutors from using comments made by an individual in reaction to police custody questioning as witnesses in their case unless they can prove that the person was advised of the right to contact an attorney both before and during inquiry. Some deemed Miranda a drastic shift in US criminal law.
