The correct answers are treatment; depression levels.
Answer 1: The independent variable (IV) in this study is the treatment the clients receive; that is, whether or not they received <span>cognitive-behavioral treatment. An IV is an experimental variable in a study that is controlled and manipulated in order to measure its effects on dependent variables or outcomes.
Answer 2: </span>The dependent variable (DV) in this study is the clients' depression levels. DVs refer to outcome variables or results that are obtained as a result of manipulating an IV. In this instance, the manipulation of the IV (whether the participants received cognitive-behavioral treatment or were instead wait-listed) led to the DV- clients' depression levels. Specifically the researchers were investigating whether receiving the treatment had an influence on clients' depression levels.
Answer:
d. all of the above
Explanation:
Arbitration is a legal technique of resolving disputes outside the courts, whereby parties involved in the dispute refer it to an arbitrator (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal") or arbitrators( one or more persons) , by whose decision (the "award") they may be bound(as in mandatory arbitration) or not(as in voluntary or nonbinding arbitration).
The above methods of arbitration :peer review, arbitration, mediation all allow the dispute parties' input before arbitration decision. Peer review method involves dispute resolution in the workplace whereby employees are able to take disputes to fellow employees and managers to act as arbitrator to resolve disputes which may not be binding on the parties. Mediation on another hand is a dynamic method of dispute resolution where a third party helps to resolve disputes by helping dispute parties negotiate to resolve to dispute. Arbitration however differs from mediation in that the arbitrator makes decisions based on evidence presented and not waiting to negotiate an agreement between both parties. All three methods however require dispute parties to make inputs so as to arrive on final decision.
Answer:
Members of congress.
Explanation:
As it is known that framers has placed their work about the said topic that the court has to follow the majority's preference especially in types of societies we find ourselves. In as much as they were smart and visionaries, a lot about the people are been asked to be in consideration in rulings. E.g Privacy is seen to put in here as identity theft is random and also medical histories are private and need not be shared with the general public as it is seen to come to financial records. Therefore congress members are seen to be less oportuned here.
Slaves were not because i hate to say it they were black and black people were slaves
I believe the last answer because decisions are run through all 3 branch’s before being made official.
