Answer:
True
Explanation:
Modifiers are forms of adjectives/adverbs which helps to tell more about something. It tells ‘what kind and how many’ in the description of the word involved. For example a black hat has black as its modified as it tells more about what kind of hat is being talked about.
Three goals scored also has three as its modifier as it tells how many goals were scored. This makes the statement about modifiers telling what kind and how many being true.
Because, I don't think anybody wants to live in a community full of trash. (Littering) :)
Answer:
Generally, conflicts arise from mismatches between power, organizational demands and feelings of personal worth..
<em>Human relations view of conflict means to accept that conflict is a important aspect of any organization. Rather than seeing it as a negative or a necessity it needs to be managed. If all of that is right. Then an example would be; If one person agues that Alternating current electricity is better than direct current electricity and the other says the opposite. The outcome now is that it is more beneficial we use both in everyday life. A/C is a safer and simplistic use of electricity for power converters while d/c is needed to supply a constant frequency current to LED lighting. Without both sides advancing we wouldn’t be able to keep progressing. or maybe that is a bad example… Maybe you start a business and you feel quality is a better formula than quantity. But you have such a high demand for your product your cheaper opponents outsell you. So now you decide to make a part of the product with a cheaper material. Thus still being superior product yet the quality has decreased. But now you have achieved a higher goal than you would have otherwise. I think conflict helps a company grow but if it leans too far one way outcome will become someone else’s achievement. If you cut out all conflict you may never be able to adapt to succeed.</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer:
The British felt justified in demanding the colonists to pay up in order to pay debts left from the French and Indian War.
Explanation:
You see, The British and French had colonies in the New World. Those colonies were like some kind of economic revenue that the nations could exploit. The French had a policy of trading with indigenous peoples while the English had a policy over dominating indigenous peoples and instigating wars. Those wars exacerbated mistrust between the indigenous chiefs and the colonists.
Decades later, The British and the French went to war in the 1750s over colonies. The British allied with the locals while the French allied with some other local tribes. In the end, the British won the majority of all French Colonies.
After the war, the colonists were taxed by Britain and felt since they were not represented in Parliament, they felt they didnt deserve to be taxed. This rift in opinion torwards independence can be attributed to all the colonial taxes that the british imposed on the colonists (future Americans)
Answer:
the student’s First Amendment rights violated yes bc the first amendment is freedom of speech....it doesn't have to be nice.... it says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." it says nowhere in there that the freedom of speech had to be nice.
Explanation:
