Explanation:
"which of the following" meaning there's options to choose from, so please list those too. But I'll tell you what I got!:)
In ways, it means "free."
You can pick your own job, you can invest, become an entrepreneur, essentially things that make you free. The ability to vote for who leads the country, instead of it being by bloodline.
A 3-year-old preschool-aged child who goes.
"Children" and "Childhood" redirect here. For other uses, see Child (disambiguation), Children (disambiguation), and Childhood (disambiguation).
The child may also describe a relationship with a parent (such as sons and daughters of any age) or, metaphorically, an authority figure, or signify group membership in a clan, tribe, or religion; it can also signify being strongly affected by a specific time, place, or circumstance, as in "a child of nature" or "a child of the Sixties.
Learn more about Children here; brainly.com/question/26423521
#SPJ4
Answer:
THE ANSWER IS A
Explanation:
ITS IN THE BIBLE
MATTHEW IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
Locke's Second Treatise on Civil Government.
Locke quarreled for the belief that the individuals are conclusively the reference of powers in supervising, Thus the individual also has the freedom to dismount a party that is not suitably accepting the nation's people. John Locke was discussing the concept of a "social contract." According to his opinion, a government's capability to administer by the permission of the people. This was a transition from the unfounded beliefs of "divine right monarchy" that a king governed because Lord designated him to be the leader. Locke discarded the acceptance of the spiritual right government in his First Treatise on Civil Government. In his Second Treatise on Civil Government, Locke contended for the benefits of the people to organize their ministries according to their wishes and to protect their personal life, education, and resources.
Human rights in the United States comprise a series of rights which are legally protected by the Constitution of the United States, including the amendments,[2][3] state constitutions, conferred by treaty, and enacted legislatively through Congress, state legislatures, and state referenda and citizen's initiatives. Federal courts in the United States have jurisdiction over international human rights laws as a federal question, arising under international law, which is part of the law of the United States.[4]
The human rights record of the United States of America is a complicated matter; first and foremost the Federal Government of the United States has, through a ratified constitution and amendments thereof, guaranteed unalienable rights to citizens of the country, and also to some degree, non-citizens. However, the historical evolution of these rights must be considered as well, as the periphery of the population of the United States who had access to these rights has expanded over time, and in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights has not fully expanded complete rights to all human beings within its borders as compared to the international standard set by the United Nations General Assembly, because of social and political issues that stem from the history of the United States.
