This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we can still develop some ideas that might help you in your work.
The House of Representatives can be considered both the people's branch and the insiders' branch. However, there is no question that the institution is now a lot more restrictive and less connected to the people than it was when the Framers designed it. Therefore, I would argue that it has become an insiders' branch.
First, legislators do not listen to constituents all the time. This is because each legislators has an enormous amount of constituents, all of which have very different characteristics. Moreover, legislators need to reconcile the interests of their constituents with those of other groups.
Second, the policymaking process makes it difficult for the public to monitor and evaluate the House. This is because common people do not have access to the necessary information to make this possible. Moreover, the process is long and complicated, and cannot be easily understood by all people.
Finally, partisan gerrymandering and polarization means that certain groups of constituents are much more important to a politician's career and support than others. This includes constituents in swing states, or constituents who support a particular party. Therefore, these constituents might see their interests represented more often than others.
Answer:
Beneficence.
Explanation:
Principle of beneficence can be defined as a moral obligation of researchers, physicians or scientists to act in a way that is beneficial to others, prevent and remove conditions that could be harmful, and rescue individuals that are in danger.
This ultimately implies that, the principle of beneficence is an ethical or moral rule that is mainly focused on promoting actions that are good and beneficial to others while limiting any potential for harm.
Hence, the principle of beneficence means that researchers should attempt to maximize the benefits of participation and take steps to identify and limit the potential for harm
Answer: sorry its a lot
Explanation:Why did Latin American nations have difficulty implementing democracies? Because of regional and political factors they fought all the time. ... The US had emerged as a western hemisphere policeman nations industry the colonial era had locoed cash crops.
How has U.S. involvement in Latin America both helped and hurt the region? Benefited through the OAS - democracy, economic cooperation, human rights. Hurt through military interference, conflict with various countries in order stop spread communism. ... It impacts the dominant leader of a country (Juan Peron).
Steep mountains and tropical forests made land transport difficult to impossible. This led to the fragmentation of the Spanish New World empire into many, mostly relatively small countries and hindered the development of trade both between and within countries.
The causes of the Latin American revolutions included the inspiration from the French and American revolution, Napoleon's conquest of Spain triggered revolts, injustices and repression (committed by royal officials) Political and military jobs controlled by Peninsulares, Peninsulares and Creoles controlled wealth,
Answer:
Using records of flood patterns to predict future flooding is one example that is an application of the principle of uniformitarianism.
Answer:
antipsychotic drugs
Explanation:
Antipsychotic drugs: The term antipsychotic drugs are known as the drugs that are being used in the treatment of symptoms related to psychosis, for example, auditory or visual delusions, paranoia, confused thoughts, and hallucinations, etc. These antipsychotic drugs are also being used in the treatment of chronic disorder treatment such as severe depression, schizophrenia, or severe anxiety, etc.
Example of antipsychotic drugs: paliperidone (Invega), clozapine (Clozaril), risperidone (Risperdal), etc.
