Answer:
( -2 , 0 ) maximum
Step-by-step explanation:
Watch the graph and point out the coordinates.
if its vertex is less that 0 or negative, then maximum.
With vertex being greater than 0 or positive, its minimum.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

<em>hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>helps</em><em> </em><em>you</em>
<em>let</em><em> </em><em>me</em><em> </em><em>know</em><em> </em><em>if</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em> </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>another</em><em> </em><em>questions</em><em>:-)</em>
Answer: 6.25 or 6 
Step-by-step explanation:
Lets do a pro gamer move and convert all fractions to decimals.
We now have 1+1+1.25+1.5+1.5.
From there on we simply do addition.
1+1+1.25+1.5+1.5=6.25
We get 6.25 or 6 
Answer:
$883.40
Step-by-step explanation:
Calculate the amount of money needed to pay after the discount.n
$1049 × 88% = $923.12
Calculate the amount of money needed to pay after the tax.
$923.12 × 104.5% = $883.3684210526
=$883.40(rounded off to nearest cents)
hope this helps
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.