1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yulyashka [42]
3 years ago
14

HELP!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!

History
1 answer:
Ipatiy [6.2K]3 years ago
4 0

Major Executive officials and all judges were to be elected by popular vote.

1. Because that IS what happen. Voters had little to do with who was elected and many rich and big bad bosses chose who went in which office.

2.Also the other answers have nothing to do with the question lol.

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
Were most leaders with absolute power fair ?????
snow_lady [41]

<u>Answer: </u>

Unfortunately most leaders with absolute power are not fair. More often than not many leaders egregiously abuse their power by mistreating their people.

To name a few; Fidel Castro, Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un.

I hope this helps!

If it did please vote and mark me Brainliest! (You'll help me move up my rank :D)

p.s. have any more questions? Post the question and comment the link below!

Happy Valentines Day!!!

♥, Sadie  

3 0
3 years ago
Which answer best describes the outcome of many of Andrew Johnson's vetoes?
allochka39001 [22]
The answer to this is C
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What empire was the first to unify india
frozen [14]

it was the mauryan empire

6 0
3 years ago
What ideas from Montesquieu did our founding fathers incorporate into our<br> constitution and why?
Afina-wow [57]

He conceived the idea of separating government authority into the three major branches: executive, legislative and judicial. This perspective significantly influenced the authors of the Constitution in establishing laws and division of duties, and also in the inclusion of provisions to preserve individual liberties.

4 0
3 years ago
The lend-lease act did not violate the neutrality acts because?
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

The Lend-Lease Acts did not violate the Neutrality Acts because the Neutrality Act of 1939 because no weapons or ammunitions were actually sold to the British

It had already made it possible to break out of isolationism. The Lend-Lease Act, passed by Congress in March 1941, gave President Roosevelt essentially unrestricted power to send supplies like food, ammunition, tanks, airplanes, and trucks to help with the war effort in Europe without going against the country's formal neutrality policy. Beginning in 1935, Congress implemented a number of laws to keep American companies and persons out of wars and to promote neutrality. The Lend- Lease Act was passed in response to Pearl Harbor Attack.

To know more about Lend- Lease Act here

brainly.com/question/1126649

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • List three immediate causes of the 1917 revolution in Russia.
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Chamberlain die?
    11·2 answers
  • "I fear that a strong central government would take over" Would most likely be a statement by which group during the constitutio
    9·1 answer
  • Summarize the importants events that led to the Korean war 
    6·2 answers
  • The Austro-Hungarian Empire and what other empire were carved up by the Treaty of Versailles?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of these is not an era of Egyptian history.​
    14·1 answer
  • The main benefit that tourism brings to Florida’s economy is to
    7·2 answers
  • Explain the term deontologist​
    5·1 answer
  • Save
    13·1 answer
  • Can the descendants of Gautama Buddha be traced today?.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!