1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga_2 [115]
3 years ago
9

Define a variable write an equation and solve the problem. the width of a rectangle is 3 meters more than one-fourth its length.

the perimeter is 10 meters more than twice its length. find the length and width
Mathematics
1 answer:
sweet [91]3 years ago
4 0

Let's assume

length of rectangle is L

width of rectangle is W

the width of a rectangle is 3 meters more than one-fourth its length

so,

W=3+\frac{1}{4} L

the perimeter is 10 meters more than twice its length

we know that

perimeter =2(L+W)

so, we get

2(L+W)=10+2L

now, we can simplify it

2L+2W=10+2L

subtract both sides by 2L

2L+2W-2L=10+2L-2L

2W=10

W=5

now, we can find L

5=3+\frac{1}{4} L

subtract both sides 3

5-3=3-3+\frac{1}{4} L

2=\frac{1}{4} L

multiply both sides by 4

4*2=4*\frac{1}{4} L

L=8

so,

length of rectangle is 8 meter

width of rectangle is 5 meter ............Answer

You might be interested in
3. A team of eye surgeons has developed a new technique for a risky eye operation to restore the
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Yes the new method if sample size was less than 20 than that of old method or identical sample numbers of old and new the differences still prove the new operation is better. As 88 patients minus 1% still shows us 76.7475 significance of  old method being low point 67.5 = 30% of 225 and proved a 65.25 low point and 69.75 high point which is also a 20% jump to new methods low point significance.

You cna show this as workings to prove or follow any of the below statements.

Where new method of 88 patients -0.01 significance rate stands at 76.7475. This figure has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients to 76.7 we compare this to the old method if reversing significance we find  = 62.5 and it's 30% standing value of 67.5  as +1% increase shows us 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

Step-by-step explanation:

88/225  = 0.39111111111 = 39.11%%

P value 01 = 1%  =  225.225 or 5% range of alternative hypotheses.

To graph the P value we take the distance between the sample mean and the null hypothesis value (225 + 1% of sample - x nhv) = y ). We can graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean  (225 +/- ( x +1% of sample) where nhv has a decimal if needed to utilize the 1% added). we would replace nvp in this example with  Ha or H1 which means the alternative hypotheses as the data shows less than or equal to.

We can then show 225.225 -  Ha or H1  then graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is at least extreme in both tails  Ha or H1

However it would be the other way round where you take the first set of data and use the sample as the 30% significance of that sample indicates it may be a larger sample or a higher significance. Therefore this would be used in the graphing - 1%

We prove that 30-1 =29  where 29% of 225 = 225 x 0.29 = 65.25

this way we have proved that the new set of data being equal to 88 patients regaining their eyesight is <23 and can be written like this 65.25< x <88

This means that sample mean has taken the 1% to show on the graph we can show 225> 33.11 +1 .

We can prove that both indifference of significance would reduce when 1% is added and close based on being a higher percentage to begin with.

34.11 = 0.3411 x 225 = 76.7475 for second surgeon = 33.11% +1

Where as shown

30 = 0.3 x 225 = 67.5

76.5475 - 67.5 = 9.04 difference when comparing old method = +1%

where new method stands at 76.7475 has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients and where old method if reversing = 62.5 and has reduced from 67.5  as +1% and 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

You would therefore graph each higher methods first if comparing both by 0.01 or show 88 on graph and 76.7475 = +1%

NB/ if sample size was 20 more in the old data then 225+20 = 245 x 0.29 = 71.05 and would still be lower than new data. = 2.0 increase level of significance and not relevant unless you are looking for the decrease which means new is greater than 20% success than that of old method findings where 30% = 67.5.

5 0
3 years ago
Will upvoate all
nalin [4]
I think the answer is going to be a
7 0
3 years ago
The following parts refer to the letters: LAMEFIREALARM. Recall that "word" means distinguishable letter arrangements. (a) How m
larisa86 [58]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The word "LAMEFIREALARM" word consists of

2L , 2M, 2E , 2R , 3A , F and I

no of words with the above letters such that M's are not together

=Total No of words- M's are together

Total no of words=\frac{13!}{4\times 2!\times 3!}=64,864,800

When M's are together . considering 2 M's as one

therefore there are \frac{12!}{3\times 2!\times 3!}=9,979,200

No of ways=\frac{13!}{4\times 2!\times 3!}-\frac{12!}{3\times 2!\times 3!}=54,885,600

(b)No of ways such that M's are separated by at least 2 letters

at least  2 letter means 2 letter, 3 letter ......11 letters

So we have to subtract no of ways where there are 1 letter in between M's from total no of ways where 2 M's are not next to each other

No of ways in which there is 1 letter between 2 M's

This can be done by considering 11 cases

In first case Place first M in Starting Position and 2 M on third place

Second case place First M in 2 nd Position and second M on 4 th place

Similarly For 11th case

Place first M in 11th place and second M on 13th place

Total ways

=\frac{11\times 11!}{3!\times 2!\times 2!\times 2!}

So , the total number of arrangements of the letters of the word LAMEFIREALARM where the two M's are separated by atleast two letters is

=\frac{13!}{4\times 2!\times 3!}-\frac{12!}{3\times 2!\times 3!}-\frac{11\times 11!}{3!\times 2!\times 2!\times 2!}

=45738000

7 0
3 years ago
What is a factor of 15 but not a multiple of 3
11111nata11111 [884]
45
15 is a multiple of 3
30 is a multiple of 3
45 is NOT a multiple of 3
60 is a multiple of 3
Ect.
7 0
3 years ago
What is the value of the expression below when x = 7?<br>5x - 7​
Zina [86]

Answer:

28

Step-by-step explanation:

5x -7\\x =7

Substitute 7 for x in the given equation

5x -7\\\\= 5(7) -7\\\\= 35-7\\\\= 28

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How many triangles can I make with side lengths of 15 in, 7 in, and 4 in?
    12·1 answer
  • CAN YOU GUYS PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTION RIGHT FOR ONCE
    12·2 answers
  • What is the width of a rectangle with an area of 5/8 and a length of 10 inches ?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help ME!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Joseph jumped off of a cliff into the ocean in Miami while vacationing with some friends. His height as a function of time is gi
    6·1 answer
  • Read the graph. A bar graph titled Jobs Created by New Businesses in the U S from 2005 to 2010 has years on the x-axis and jobs
    10·2 answers
  • Raja drove from A to B at an average speed of 50mph
    6·1 answer
  • Micah ran 3 miles in 30 minutes. At this rate, what is the total number of minutes
    7·1 answer
  • What dose f(-2)=3 mean?
    7·2 answers
  • Please help me with this I would give you 50 points.
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!