Answer:
And we can solve for y and we got:
And using condition (1) we can solve for x and we got:
So then the minimum cost for this case would be:
Explanation:
For this case the graph attached illustrate the problem for this case
We know that the total area is 60000, so then we have:
If we solve for x we got:
(1)
Now we can define the cost function like this:
We can use the condition (1) and if we replace in the cost function we have:
Since we need to minimize the cost, we can derivate the function in terms of y and we got:
And we can solve for y and we got:
And using condition (1) we can solve for x and we got:
So then the minimum cost for this case would be:
An unfavorable materials quantity variance indicates that the actual usage of materials exceeds the standard material allowed for output.
<h3>What do you mean by material quantity variance?</h3>
The material quantity variance refers to the difference between the standard amount and the actual amount of materials used in the production process.
The material quantity variance yield unusual results as it is based on a standard unit quantity that is not even close to the actual usage.
Therefore, an unfavorable materials quantity variance indicates that the actual usage of materials exceeds the standard material allowed for output.
Learn more about Material Quantity variance here:
brainly.com/question/15082996
#SPJ1
Answer:
Corporate income tax
Explanation:
A corporate income tax (CIT) is levied by federal and state governments on business profits, which are revenues (what a business makes in sales) minus costs (the cost of doing business).
Answer:
$1,574,000
Explanation:
Cash collections from customers during the period using direct method is computed as;
= Credit sales + Beginning accounts receivables - Ending accounts receivables
= $1,696,000 + ($175,000 - $297,000)
= $1,692,000 - $122,000
= $1,574,000
Answer:
Grab some paper and wrap it around unchewed gum and do that for the amount of gum you want, Then put it in a small box.
