9514 1404 393
Answer:
see attached
Step-by-step explanation:
The attachment shows the table of point values and the graph.
Check the picture below
so.. .hmmm the vertex is at the origin... and we know the parabola passes through those two points... let's use either.. say hmmm 100,-50, to get the coefficient "a"
keep in mind that, the parabolic dome is vertical, thus we use the y = a(x-h)²+k version for parabolas, which is a vertical parabola
as opposed to x = (y-k)²+h, anyway, let's find "a"

now.. .your choices, show.... a constant on the end.... a constant at the end, is just a vertical shift from the parent equation, the equation we've got above.. is just the parent equation, since we used the origin as the vertex, it has a vertical shift of 0, and thus no constant, but is basically, the same parabola, the one in the choices is just a shifted version, is all.
Answer:
4. 27
Step-by-step explanation:
11-10=1 which is <=16
15-10=5 which is <=16
26-10=16 which is <=16
27-10=17 which isn't <=16
Therefore 27 doesn't satisfy the inequality
Answer:
ham
tam
mat
hat
at
ha
am
ma
Step-by-step explanation:
The true statement about the residual plot is (a) The regression line is a good model because there is no pattern in the residuals.
<h3>How to interpret the residual plot?</h3>
For a residual plot to be considered a good model, the points on the plot must be at random and they must not follow a specific pattern
From the graph, we can see that the points are scattered
Hence, the true statement about the residual plot is (a)
Read more about residual plots at:
brainly.com/question/9329287
#SPJ1