Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis of a conditional statement is the "if" part. This means the hypothesis is "If a line is bisected."
The conclusion of a conditional statement is the "then" part. This means the conclusion is "then it is cut into two equal parts."
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. Feel free to ask more questions.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is <span>D.300°</span>.<span>
</span><span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you.</span>
Answer:
The answer is 3 11/20
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract whole numbers, 11 - 8 = 3
Then combine fractions 3/4 - 2/10= 11/20
hope this helps! :D
Answer:
56.39 nm
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to have constructive interference total optical path difference should be an integral number of wavelengths (crest and crest should be interfered). Therefore the constructive interference condition for soap film can be written as,
![2t=(m+\frac{1}{2} ).\frac{\lambda}{n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2t%3D%28m%2B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%29.%5Cfrac%7B%5Clambda%7D%7Bn%7D)
where λ is the wavelength of light and n is the refractive index of soap film, t is the thickness of the film, and m=0,1,2 ...
Please note that here we include an additional 1/2λ phase shift due to reflection from air-soap interface, because refractive index of latter is higher.
In order to have its longest constructive reflection at the red end (700 nm)
![t_1=(m+\frac{1}{2} ).\frac{\lambda}{2.n}\\ \\ t_1=\frac{1}{2} .\frac{700}{(2)*(1.33)}\\ \\ t_1=131.58\ nm](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t_1%3D%28m%2B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%29.%5Cfrac%7B%5Clambda%7D%7B2.n%7D%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20t_1%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20.%5Cfrac%7B700%7D%7B%282%29%2A%281.33%29%7D%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20t_1%3D131.58%5C%20nm)
Here we take m=0.
Similarly for the constructive reflection at the blue end (400 nm)
![t_2=(m+\frac{1}{2} ).\frac{\lambda}{2.n}\\ \\ t_2=\frac{1}{2} .\frac{400}{(2)*(1.33)}\\ \\ t_2=75.19\ nm](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t_2%3D%28m%2B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%29.%5Cfrac%7B%5Clambda%7D%7B2.n%7D%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20t_2%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20.%5Cfrac%7B400%7D%7B%282%29%2A%281.33%29%7D%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20t_2%3D75.19%5C%20nm)
Hence the thickness difference should be
![t_1-t_2=131.58-75.19=56.39 \ nm](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t_1-t_2%3D131.58-75.19%3D56.39%20%5C%20nm)