Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.
Judges developed means of coping with bad law in order to protect the integrity of the judiciary.
<h3>What is judiciary?</h3>
The judiciary, sometimes referred to as the judicial system, judicature, judicial branch, judicative branch, court, or judiciary system, is a system of courts that decides legal issues and applies, defends, and interprets the law in legal proceedings.
<h3>What is legal proceedings?</h3>
A legal proceeding is an action that aims to use a tribunal's authority to enact law.
- Activities, such as service of process, were required to have a court find that legal process had been provided.
- Conduct of a trial, whether it be a criminal trial, civil trial, or both.
- Issuing and carrying out court orders, such as those mandating receivership or foreclosure.
- Hearings, especially those that are administrative.
- Arbitration.
To learn more about judiciary visit:
brainly.com/question/14305259
#SPJ4
Carl Jung work would Penelope likely cite to explain the observation.
Option D
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
There is frequent appearance of some characters, though the fact that the cultures Penelope is studying had little or no connection with each other. So, its most likely that Penelope would refer to Carl Jung's concept of archetypes, as he has been associated with such similarities.
As Jung states, these archetypes are collective unconscious of the common content that is being observed. Such common contents have their different appearance in myths, dreams, art, and stories. Also, such characters appear in literature and can be traced back to myths such as the hero.
Answer: Interactionist perspective
Explanation:
Interactionist perspective deals with how people relate with others in a society they have found themselves in, how they socialize quickly by interactions and how they behave amongst themselves. This looks at how humans react on basic things that is relative amongst them
Answer:
From the statement below, the one that correctly describes a nutrient content claim is the one that talks about reduced sodium being a product having twenty five percent less sodium than the main or original product.
Explanation:
