Answer:
Framing.
Explanation:
The case of framing a death penalty convict is a frequent dilemma that surrounds most cases among capital punishment criminals. Due to the increased media coverage, there can arise many more sides of the story, leading to more speculation of whether the person is guilty or not.
The media coverage leads to a massive support system for the convicts and presents an increase in the awareness of the case and the possibility of convicting the wrong man. The chance that an innocent man may be executed by a wrongful accusation has led to massive public awareness ad influence the public's opinion, thereby leading to increased speculation of wrongly executing an innocent man. This then leads to <u>an innocent man being "framed" or made to appear guilty for the government had already made a mistake and it is easier to frame him rather than admit their mistake in public. </u>
<span>individualistic, American culture - This hypothesis was proposed by Christopher P. Earley. Social loafing is when a person puts less effort when working in a group than when working alone. Earley' s studies found that people from individualistic cultures had lesser tendencies to work to their potential in group activities and were more prone to social loafing. This was in contrast to collectivist cultures like Chinese. People of the Chinese culture were found to be better performers at group activities. </span>
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on 28th June 1914, it triggered a chain of events that resulted in World War 1. President Woodrow Wilson declared that the United States would remain “impartial in thought as well as in action.” At the time, a vast majority of Americans approved of Wilson's policy of strict U.S. neutrality.
No if it is required to give out a union address you have to do it no matter what the public thinks