People protest due to different reasons. From an anthropological perspective, what is this called is an <u>expressing agency</u>.
<h3>Why were there protests in China in 1989?
</h3>
- The protests was influenced due to the death of pro-reform Chinese Communist Party (CCP),a man called general secretary Hu Yaobang in April 1989.
Due to the rapid economic development and social change in post-Mao China, a lot was shown about the fear among the people and political elite about the future of the country. By <u>expressing agency, </u>They have a sense of control over their actions and the results of those actions.
See full question below
In 1989, a large number of people in China protested the lack of democratic process through demonstrations in Tiananmen Square. From an anthropological perspective, what is this called?
a. actor networks
b. expressing agency
c. hegemony
d. structural functionalism
Learn more about China protest from
brainly.com/question/523397
<span>it protects private homeowners from having to house soldiers during times of peace and times of war
The 3rd amendment prevents soldiers from forcibly overtaking a person's home during peace time without the owner's explicit consent. There is another provision preventing soldiers from being housed during times of war without the owner's consent.</span>
Answer:
rationality over spirituality
Explanation:
Hello! The United States is a country with many developed theories about leadership, which means that there was a deep-field study linked to academics. That is why rationalism is over spirituality since reasoning was used to form the theories because it considers more efficient.
Thanks for your question!
The Low country of South Carolina tends to oppose independence from Great Britain in the years before the American Revolution because they suffered a lot as a result of the Mercantilist policies initiated by Great Britain. This policy of Great Britain offered subsidies and marketplace to South Carolina.
The Hammurabi code was appropriate for checking the impunity of that era, where the poor and the weak lived at the mercy of the strong and wealthy.Some aspects however are no longer applicable with the modern conception of justice and fairness. For example,binding creditors to sell their wives and children to repay their debts is no longer practical but also cruel.
