Answer:
2. Men interrupt women more; men talk significantly more
Explanation: Research conducted at Stanford university,New York times has highlighted that in group discussions men interrupt women more and talk more significantly too. This is believed to be so because women low representations in the leadership team or position of most organisations. Generally,the researchers are proposing a better women representations to reduce to stop this negative tendencies.
Answer:
<em>In economics, economic equilibrium is a situation in which economic forces such as supply and demand are balanced and in the absence of external influences the (equilibrium) values of economic variables will not change.</em>
<em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em>
<span>Jerome operates under heteronomous morality while Hani is operating under autonomous morality. Under Jerome's schema, the outcome of the action and the rules of the world determine the morality of an action, without understanding the intentions or the mitigating factors that might be at play. Autonomous morality, however, sees that there are shades of grey to every situation and that morality does not always require a punishment for every action or transgression.</span>
Question options:
A autonomy
B protocols
C voluntarism
D right to privacy
Answer:
Autonomy
Explanation:
Under the principle of autononmy, part of the elements of the principle of respect for persons, an individual who has been duly informed(informed consent by researcher) and is capable of making his own decisions can decide if he wishes to participate in a research and can also refuse to answer certain questions in the research. He may also choose to withdraw from the research at any time he wishes.
It is the decision of the Supreme Court complex ruling in O'Connor v. Ortega. This case delineated two sectors in the workplace: public and private. Within the private sector, the Supreme Courts stated, "Every warrantless workplace search must be evaluated carefully on its facts. In the public sector, however, as established in the O'Connor case, public agencies may have compelling reasons to search in the workplace.