Answer:
A) While parts (1) and (3) are accurate, part (2) needs revision.
Explanation:
<em>Mesopotamia societies are comprised of some major civilizations like the Sumerian, Assyrian, Akkadian, and Babylonian civilizations.</em> These civilizations has and share so many things in common. Parft being the classification of individuals into three classes with <u>the nobility class</u> (Priests and Priest kings) being the highest. This as a result of their believe of thier rulers being divinely mandated by the gods.
<em>As for the third point, the societies became a birth place of a circular society that separated the church from the state. </em>This could be seen in the subsequent civilizations which adopted a more approachable way of selecting their leaders while keeping their religious leaders outside the court. It also metamorphosed as a result of <u>the free citizens</u> becoming a combination of modern day middle and lower class like the merchants, craftmen, farmers, fishermams, hunters e.t.c..
Part 2 needs revision as a result of the fact that, the society's growth didn't lead to more complex government and bureaucracies, but rather, the ancient method of <em>one ruler</em> is still maintained with few council of elders (with the priest inclusive) employed to assist the ruler in enforcing his laws
I inferred you are referring to this excerpt from the text;
"Most people measure their happiness in terms of physical pleasure and material possession. Could they win some visible goal which they have set on the horizon, how happy they could be! Lacking this gift or that circumstance, they would be miserable. If happiness is to be so measured, I who cannot hear or see have every reason to sit in a corner with folded hands and weep. If I am happy in spite of my deprivations, if my happiness is so deep that it is a faith, so thoughtful that it becomes a philosophy of life, — if, in short, I am an optimist, my testimony to the creed of optimism is worth hearing."
<u>Explanation</u>:
The author here uses her personal experience of been deaf-blind to assert that an individual's happiness is not dependent on his or her circumstances. Helen says "I who cannot hear or see...I am happy in spite of my deprivations if my happiness is so deep that it is a faith, so thoughtful that it becomes a philosophy of life."
We notice her use of convincing language such as when she says "my testimony to the creed of optimism is worth hearing", this language gives her message a convincing feel.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
A has a better tone to go at the end of the paragraph.
