Answer:
From the figure, it can be seen that ΔJ'K'L' is formed from ΔJKL by the rotation of ΔJKL by 90 degrees counter-clockwise.
It can also be seen that ΔJ"K"L" is obtained from ΔJ'K'L' by the refrection of ΔJ'K'L' across the x-axis.
Therefore, the rule that describes the composition of transformations that maps ΔJKL to ΔJ"K"L" is given by
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The correct option is;
comparing plant survivorship in areas where hikers stay on the trail with plants where hikers leave the trail
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis that the area formerly covered by known plants which is now bare soil due to trampling in the alpine areas by hikers can be tested by means of comparing the areas where during the cause of their visit, the hikers remain on the trail as they move within the park to other portion of the park where it is known that there are either very few or no hiker remain on the trail. The outcome will determine if the cause of the appearance of bare soil is due to the transit and trampling by hikers.
(10,000,000) + (6,000,000) + (100,000) + (7,000) + (300) + (20)
Tomas used incorrectly the rule of signs, the expression should be simplified as follows:
-2.6 + (-5.4)
-2.6 -5.4 = 8
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What mistake did Tomas likely make?</h3>
Here Tomas wants to perform an addition between two numbers:
-2.6 + (-5.4)
And the outcome that Tomas gets is:
-2.6 + (-5.4) = 2.8
Here his mistake seems to bee that he thought the second number was a positive number, and he solved the operation:
-2.6 + 5.4
So, he used wrong the rule of signs.
Remember that the rule of signs says that:
(-)*(+) = (+)*(-) = (-)
Using that, we can rewrite the original expression:
-2.6 + (-5.4)
to:
-2.6 - 5.4
Solving that, we get:
-2.6 - 5.4 = -8
Which is the outcome that Tomas would have gotten if he had used correctly the rule of signs.
If you want to learn more about the rule of signs:
brainly.com/question/13333620
#SPJ1
Answer:
<h2>C </h2>
Hope It Help
Step-by-step explanation:
Brainliest please
