Based on historical perspective, the South tried to justify the "<u>Chàttel Slàvery</u> by arguing that keeping slavery was a matter of states' rights, but the South also favored <u>Fúgitive Slàve Law</u> which took away Northern States' rights to protect enslaved people who had escaped to the North.
<h3>What is Chàttel Slàve?</h3>
The chàttel slàve is the form of slavery arrangement whereby an individual has the ownership of another man to work for him as he pleases, either at home or in fields.
During the debate on the abolition of slàvery between North and South, the Southern States argued that chàttel slàvery is no different than wage slàvery, and it should be the state's right to determine whether to be a slàve state or free state.
Again, during the debate, the south argued in favor of the <u>Fugitivé Slàve Law.</u> This law mandated Northerners to turn escaped slàves who moved to the North back over to their Southern owners, though it was against their rights to protect enslaved people.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Chàttel Slàvery and Fugitíve Slàve Law accordingly.
Learn more about the Fugítive Slàve Law here: brainly.com/question/9505313
Answer:
Napolean crowned himself emperor.
Explanation:
Napolean Bonaparte's coronation in 1804 is ironic since he declared himself Emperor. Napoleon Bonaparte was France's first emperor and considered one of the country's finest military leaders. Napoleon was recognized as a military genius because he won several wars for France, allowing the country to expand. Despite his military background, Napolean crowned himself Emperor and declared that he would not be ruled by the Romans or submit to any force other than himself. As a result, the Crowning of 1804 is ironic because he crowned himself Emperor.
Answer: They both developed law codes to be put on public display.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is John Locke
Use it to help others out.
