<h3>Hello there!</h3>
Your question asks what an opportunity cost of an action is.
<h3>Answer: D). is a subjective valuation that can be determined only by the individual who chooses the action.</h3>
The reason why answer choice "D). is a subjective valuation that can be determined only by the individual who chooses the action" is correct because an opportunity cost of an action is not the same for everyone.
An opportunity cost of an action is subjective, meaning that the action can be determined by someone's opinion, feelings, etc. Everyone thinks differently, therefore making everyone's opportunity cost of action different.
A opportunity cost of an action also is determined by the individual themselves, not anyone else. That's why the action is subjective, due to the fact that the decision on the action is determined by the individual personal opinions and feelings.
<h3>I hope this helps!</h3><h3>Best regards,</h3><h3>MasterInvestor</h3>
Answer: 36 seconds.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the Taktzeit for the ice-cream scoopers will be calculated thus:
First and foremost, Taktzeit refers to the time taken between the beginning of production for one unit and the beginning of the next unit.
From the information given, the available Time is 1 hour which can be converted to secunds and this will be:
1 hour = 3600 seconds
Hourly Demand = 100
Then, the takzeit will be:
= 3600/100
= 36 seconds
Answer:
Résumés should be written in complete sentences. ... When selecting words to include in a résumé, they should be complex in nature.
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for <u>NICK</u> to choose <u>RIGHT</u>. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Nick chooses <u>RIGHT</u> and Rosa chooses <u>RIGHT</u>.
Explanation:
ROSA
left right
4 / 6 /
left 3 4
NICK
right 6 / 7 /
7 6
Rosa does not have a dominant strategy since both expected payoffs are equal:
- if she chooses left, her expected payoff = 3 + 7 = 10
- if she chooses right, her expected payoff = 4 + 6 = 10
Nick has a dominant strategy, if he chooses right, his expected payoff will be higher:
- if he chooses left, his expected payoff = 4 +6 = 10
- if he chooses right, his expected payoff = 6 + 7 = 13
The only possible Nash equilibrium exists if both Rosa and Nick choose right, so that their strategies are the same, resulting in Rosa earning 6 and Nick 7.
Answer:
Ethical impact statement.
Explanation:
An attempt to assess the underlying moral justifications for corporate actions and the consequent results of those actions are contained in ethical impact statement. It is typically used by an organization and its shareholders to assess the underlying moral justifications for corporate actions and the consequent results of those actions in order to be in tandem with its mission, goal and objectives.
