Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

9

Which of the following best explains why buying a single-family home in a city

2 answers:

BartSMP [9]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

C. Housing prices in cities generally increase more quickly than

anywhere else.

Explanation:

An investment is an activity that leads to an increase in value or wealth. A good investment is one that appreciates its value with a big percentage in a short period. Houses are always in demand in big cities. For this reason, their prices are ever appreciating.

Buying a single-family home in a city is a good investment decision because it is bound to appreciate in value. Should one decide to sell it later, they are highly likely to receive a much higher amount than they paid for it. The probability of making some good profits from the house is high.

sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

housing prices in cities generally increases more quickly than anywhere else

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Marta's boss tells off-color jokes and tolerates sexually based teasing by male employees of women employees. when she complains

natta225 [31]

First, it is an example of POOR MANAGEMENT. The whole scenario is an example of sexual harassment.
She can do three things; report it higher and risk retaliation, accept it as joking, and lastly LEAVE, get another job.

3 0

3 years ago

Bennett Co. has a potential new project that is expected to generate annual revenues of $255,800, with variable costs of $141,20

Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

b. $124,120

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Based on the following information, determine the amount of equipment on the balance sheet. Total liabilities and owner's equity

hammer [34]

Answer:

$9,950

Explanation:

The amount of equipment shall be determined through accounting equation which is given as follows:

Total Assets=Total liabilities+Total equity

Total assets=Current+Non current assets

Current assets+Non current assets=Total liabilities+Total equity

Non current assets=Cost of land+Cost of equipment-accumulated depreciation on equipment

Current assets+Cost of land+Cost of equipment-accumulated depreciation on equipment=Total liabilities+Total equity

Applying given data in the question to the above equation

$19,800+$15,000+Cost of equipment-$1,550=$44,750

$33,250+Cost of equipment=$44,750

Cost of equipment=$44,750-$33,250=$11,500

Amount of equipment on balance sheet=$11,500-$1,550=$9,950

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Akron Slugger Company produces various types of wooden baseball bats. It has calculated the average cost per unit of a produ

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

$\arge\boxed{\large\boxed{\$ 117,788}}$

Explanation:

Assume the <em>cost</em> equation to be:

$Cost(x)=Fixed\text{ }costs+Variable\text{ }costs\\\\Cost(x)=A+Bx$

Where $x$ is the number of units (wooden baseball bats) produced.

The <em>average cost per unit of production level</em> is the total cost divided by the number of units produced:

$Average\text{ }cost(x)=Cost(x)/x\\\\Average\text{ }cost(x)=(A+Bx)/x\\$

You are given that the <em>average cost per unit of a production level of 7,700 bats is $14</em>, then:

$14=(A+7,700B)/7,700$

You are also given that the <em>fixed costs</em> are <em>$22,500</em>, thus A = 22,500. Hence, you can substitute the value of A in the previous equation and find B:

$14=(22,500+7,700B)/7,700\\\\14\times 7,700=22,500+7,700B\\\\107,800-22,500=7,700B\\\\85,300/7,700=B\\\\B=11.08$

Now you can complete the cost equation:

$Cost(x)=\$ 22,500+11.08x$

And to predict the total costs for 8,600 bats you must subsitute x with 8,600 in the previous equation:

$Cost(8,600)=\$ 22,500+11.08(8,600)=\$ 117,788$

5 0

3 years ago

A country is said to have a _______ exchange rate when the government keeps the exchange rate against other currencies at or nea

77julia77 [94]

Answer:

Fixed

Explanation:

The government keeps the exchange rate FIXED the the same rate.

3 0

3 years ago