1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nata [24]
3 years ago
15

What is one major difference between state and federal courts in the United States?

Social Studies
2 answers:
GalinKa [24]3 years ago
4 0
The answer to this question is D. <span>Only federal courts must have judges approved by the Senate.
In general, the cases that reach the federal court usually tend to have a  big magnitude that could influence the law structure in our country. Therefore, further supervision by members of the Senate are really necessary for cases like this.</span>
Evgen [1.6K]3 years ago
4 0

<u>The option D is correct. </u>

<u>The major difference between state and federal courts in the United States is that only federal courts must have judges approved by the Senate. </u>

<u> </u>

Further Explanation:

Federal Court: These are established by the U.S. Constitution to settle disputes that involve laws made by Congress and the Constitution.

Justification for correct and incorrect answer:

A.  

Only state courts use an adversarial system during trials: This option is incorrect.

The adversarial system is used by both the federal and state courts. It is a legal system in which parties' case is represented by two advocates before a judge or jury, who determines the truth and pass judgment.

B.  

Only state courts issue verdicts in both criminal and civil cases: This option is incorrect.

The criminal cases that involve state law violations are filed in state court while criminal cases that involve violation of the federal laws can be filed only in federal court.

C.  

Only federal courts allow defendants to appeal rulings: This option is incorrect.

The appeal can be filed by the defendant in the federal court against the judgment of the trial court.

D.  

Only federal courts must have judges approved by the Senate: This option is correct.

The federal judge is appointed by the president of the United States and confirmed by the United States Senate. The state judge is appointed by the state's governor or legislature.

<u>Therefore,  The major difference between state and federal courts in the United States is that only federal courts must have judges approved by the Senate. </u>

<u />

Learn more:

1. Learn more about constitution  

   brainly.com/question/983965

2. Learn more about impeachment

   brainly.com/question/10362475

3. Learn more about federal court

  brainly.com/question/1953978

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Social Studies

Chapter: Government & Civics

Keywords: What is one major difference between state and federal courts in the United States, only state courts use an adversarial system during trials, only state courts issue verdicts in both criminal and civil cases, only federal courts allow defendants to appeal rulings, only federal courts must have judges approved by the senate.

You might be interested in
Black Death spread because of what problem in medieval Europe?
marysya [2.9K]

all of the above except too many farm animals

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You believe that elephants have intelligence and that this intelligence increases as elephants get older. You test your hypothes
Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

<em>Longitudinal study </em>

Explanation:

A longitudinal study (or longitudinal survey, or panel analysis) <em>is a research design requiring repeated measurements of the same variables</em> (e.g., humans) across short or long periods of time (e.g. using longitudinal data).

Studying the elephants across long periods of time to determine their intelligence.

It is often a form of observational study, although it could also be described as randomized longitudinal experiments.

4 0
3 years ago
Chinese New Year
umka21 [38]

Answer:

C. tangerines

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
beginning in the 1990 Georgia, Alabama and florida entered into a legal battle involving the Chattahoochee River. why did this l
iren2701 [21]

Explanation:

The states could not agree about the regulation of water flowing out of Lake Lanier.

4 0
3 years ago
3. Who is known as the Father of Modern Geology? What was his foundational contribution in
pogonyaev

Answer:

1. James Hutton

2. Hutton developed several hypotheses to explain the rock formations he saw around him, but according to Playfair he "was in no haste to publish his theory; for he was one of those who are much more delighted with the contemplation of truth, than with the praise of having discovered it". After some 25 years of work,[20] his Theory of the Earth; or an Investigation of the Laws observable in the Composition, Dissolution, and Restoration of Land upon the Globe was read to meetings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in two parts, the first by his friend Joseph Black on 7 March 1785, and the second by himself on 4 April 1785. Hutton subsequently read an abstract of his dissertation Concerning the System of the Earth, its Duration and Stability to Society meeting on 4 July 1785,[21] which he had printed and circulated privately.[22] In it, he outlined his theory as follows;

The solid parts of the present land appear in general, to have been composed of the productions of the sea, and of other materials similar to those now found upon the shores. Hence we find reason to conclude:

1st, That the land on which we rest is not simple and original, but that it is a composition, and had been formed by the operation of second causes.

2nd, That before the present land was made, there had subsisted a world composed of sea and land, in which were tides and currents, with such operations at the bottom of the sea as now take place. And,

Lastly, That while the present land was forming at the bottom of the ocean, the former land maintained plants and animals; at least the sea was then inhabited by animals, in a similar manner as it is at present.

Hence we are led to conclude, that the greater part of our land, if not the whole had been produced by operations natural to this globe; but that in order to make this land a permanent body, resisting the operations of the waters, two things had been required;

1st, The consolidation of masses formed by collections of loose or incoherent materials;

2ndly, The elevation of those consolidated masses from the bottom of the sea, the place where they were collected, to the stations in which they now remain above the level of the ocean.

3. 1785

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Kendra hears a terrible high-pitched sound in her psychology class. she knows that she perceived the sound because the high freq
    11·1 answer
  • Afrikaners are most associated with what country?
    9·2 answers
  • The release of ______ seems to underlie the "runner's high" and the euphoria sometimes associated with childbirth, painful initi
    8·1 answer
  • Many leading Native American scholars have argued in favor of affirmative action. However, some of these scholars may have perso
    10·1 answer
  • In the children's television show Pee Wee's Playhouse, the floor, globe, and chair could talk, move, and had their own personali
    10·1 answer
  • Welma is unable to accept the fact that she has been diagnosed with lung cancer. She refuses treatment despite her family's atte
    14·1 answer
  • Suzy is interested in purchasing a DVD player, and is overwhelmed by the many different models available at her local electronic
    12·1 answer
  • Which section of the Declaration of
    5·1 answer
  • Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton organized the
    6·1 answer
  • I need an essey about Judaism plllz
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!