Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
They should be allowed, but if they do, they have to prepare for people not wanting to buy it in stores.
Answer:
cons are:
*it may lead to genetic defects
*it limits genetic diversity
*over population
*negative side affects
*unfavorable diversity
pros:
*you have a potential to live longer
*tackling and defeating illness becomes easier
Explanation:
if you need some pros on it just tell me!
<em>~Roma~</em>
