Answer:
$214,500
Explanation:
For the computation of the amount of contribution margin first we need to follow some steps which are shown below:
No of units sold = Total sales ÷ selling price per unit
= $374,400 ÷ $24
= $156,00
Variable cost = No of units sold × Variable cost per unit
Variable cost = $15,600 × $13
=$202,800
Contribution margin = Sales - Variable cost
= $374,400 - $202,800
= $171,600
CM ratio = Contribution margin ÷ Sales
= $171,600 ÷ $374,400
= 0.46
Contribution margin = CM ratio × Sales Contribution margin
= 0.46 × (1.25 × $374,400)
= $214,500
Answer:
A decrease in the price of domestically produced industrial robots will be reflected in the GDP deflator but not in the consumer price index.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Although from the outset, CPI and GDP Deflator might measure something very similar, there are a couple of key contrasts. The first is that GDP Deflator incorporates just local merchandise and nothing that is imported. This is diverse because the CPI includes anything purchased by buyers, including remote merchandise.
The subsequent contrast is that the GDP Deflator is a proportion of the costs all things considered and benefits while the CPI is a proportion of just merchandise purchased by shoppers.
Answer: consensus
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the psychological phenomenon which states that the likelihood that an individual is going to perform an activity increases when he or she thinks that their potential act aligns with the willingness of others that are related to the outcomes.
In the given case, the politician is trying to persuade that majority of the voters are in his favor. This idea will generate a perception that majority are in his favor so there must be something positive in him.
Hence we can conclude that he is using consensus.
In this scenario, we have committed an error related to Procedural justice
Procedural justice refers to way of ensuring fair justice by making decisions according to fair processes to ensure fair treatment.
According to this justice rule, the same rule must be applied to similar scenario and must be impartial as well in order to ensure fair justice.
In conclusion, we have committed an error relating to procedural justice because the rule that was <em>applied to Julio </em>was <em>not applied to John</em>, therefore, there was a bias in justice.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/10925598</em>
Answer:
III only.
Cultural attitudes toward antitrust law differ.
Explanation:
Competition law is an area of law that seeks to maintain a level playing field for all participants in an industry by protecting them against anti-competitive conduct by companies.
For example two major players in an industry may collaborate to raise price of goods.
However in foreign competition law we have to consider that cultural attitudes towards antitrust law differs. What is accepted in one country may not apply in another. So there is absence of litigation when considering competition in the foreign scene.
