Egyptians has to explore and make new decisions
Is there a question or no
Answer:
The main idea of the article is that even after so many years, the crimes committed against the Jews during the Holocaust deserve to get their justice, no matter how many years have passed. And in that thought process, the former staffs of the camps were brought to court to be tried.
Explanation:
Associated Press' article "Ex-Auschwitz guard on trial in late push to punish Nazi war crimes" in the February 10, 2016, edition in of the New York Post reports the <em>"11th-hour push" </em>by the German prosecutors to punish the wrongs done against the Jews. The case of discrimination against the Jews during the Holocaust which became one of the biggest genocide in the history of the world.
The article reports how the <u>trial of former SS guard, 94- year old Reinhold Hanning</u> was brought on trial for being a participant during the Jewish genocide under the Nazi rule. The main idea of the article seems to be that <em>"simply helping the camp to function was sufficient to make one an accessory to the murders committed there."</em> This is the reason why former staffs of any concentration camps where thousands of Jews were killed were put on trial so that the victims and their families can have closure.
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
The type of consequences imposed to the violation of the rule will be depended on the severity of the violation.
- If the violation is not to severe, the violators would most likely only receive Publication of an admonishment by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. In this case, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants will publicly let the public know about the violators, but this does not lead to the suspension of the violators.
- If the violation is severe, Suspension and monetary penalty would most likely be imposed by AICPA and IRS.
They wanted to set such violators as an example so other members would be discouraged to conduct another violation.
