The answer is <span>2(–4y + 13) – 3y = –29
Step 1: Express </span><span>x from the second equation
Step 2: Substitute x into the first equation:
The system of equations is:
</span><span>2x – 3y = –29
x + 4y = 13
Step 1:
</span>The second equation is: x + 4y = 13
Rearrange it to get x: x = - 4y + 13
Step 2:
The first equation is: 2x – 3y = –29
The second equation is: x = - 4y + 13
Substitute x from the second equation into the first one:
2(-4y + 13) - 3y = -29
Therefore, the second choice is correct.
Answer:
1 is 1/2 5 is 2 1/2 and 7 would be 3 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
the length of a leg on a 45-45-90 triangle given the hypotenuse is half the length of the hypotenuse times sqrt(2)
hypotenuse = 10
10/2 =5
so the answer should be 5sqrt(2), which I don't see as a choice
Answer: the statements and resons, from the given bench, that fill in the blank are shown in italic and bold in this table:
Statement Reason
1. K is the midpoint of segment JL Given
2. segment JK ≅ segment KL <em>Definition of midpoint</em>
3. <em>L is the midpoint of segment KM</em> Given
4. <em>segment KL ≅ segment LM</em> Definition of midpoint
5. segment JK ≅ segment LM Transitive Property of
Congruence
Explanation:
1. First blank: you must indicate the reason of the statement "segment JK ≅ segment KL". Since you it is given that K is the midpoint of segment JL, the statement follows from the very <em>Definition of midpoint</em>.
2. Second blank: you must add a given statement. The other given statement is <em>segment KL ≅ segment LM</em> .
3. Third blank: you must indicate the statement that corresponds to the definition of midpoint. That is <em>segment KL ≅ segment LM</em> .
4. Fourth and fith blanks: you must indicate the statement and reason necessary to conclude with the proof. Since, you have already proved that segment JK ≅ segment KL and segment KL ≅ segment LM it is by the transitive property of congruence that segment JK ≅ segment LM.