You multiply then solve for y
<span>(–9.7 • 24) • (–0.25) = –9.7 • (24 • y)
</span>-232.8*(-0.25)=-232.8y
58.2=-232.8y
58.2/-232.8=-232.8y/-232.8
y= -0.25
Answer:
<em>least</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>greatest</em>
<em>.</em><em>86</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>8</em><em>/</em><em>9</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em>9</em>
The amount of income tax in dollars and cents is $3,895.38
Answer:
b. Do not reject H0. We do not have convincing evidence that the mean weekly time spent using the Internet by Canadians is greater than 12.7 hours.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that in a study of computer use, 1000 randomly selected Canadian Internet users were asked how much time they spend using the Internet in a typical week. The mean of the sample observations was 12.9 hours.

(Right tailed test at 5% level)
Mean difference = 0.2
Std error = 
Z statistic = 1.0540
p value = 0.145941
since p >alpha we do not reject H0.
b. Do not reject H0. We do not have convincing evidence that the mean weekly time spent using the Internet by Canadians is greater than 12.7 hours.
There are several ways two triangles can be congruent.
<em> congruent by SAS</em>
<em> congruent by corresponding theorem</em>
In
and
(see attachment), we have the following observations
--- Because O is the midpoint of line segment AD
--- Because O is the midpoint of line segment BC
---- Because vertical angles are congruent
---- Because vertical angles are congruent
Using the SAS (<em>side-angle-side</em>) postulate, we have:

Using corresponding theorem,
---- i.e. both triangles are congruent
The above congruence equation is true because:
- <em>2 sides of both triangles are congruent</em>
- <em>1 angle each of both triangles is equal</em>
- <em>Corresponding angles are equal</em>
See attachment
Read more about congruence triangles at:
brainly.com/question/20517835