Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
1. WCG agrees with its cell plan competitors to raise prices for all customers - Sherman Antitrust Act
2. WCG colludes with another company to stop offering family plan discounts - Sherman Antitrust Act
3. WCG decides to advertise a new plan that is 75 percent off the regular plan, even though it is only 20 percent less - Wheeler-Lea Act
4. WCG promises retail consumers a "wholesale" rate, even though it is the same price as always - Wheeler-Lea Act
5. WCG wants to attract more women to its plans and starts offering female consumers 30 percent off their bill - Robinson-Patman Act
6. WCG offers a discount to teenage males in an effort to get customers from its more trendy competitor - Robinson-Patman Act
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
A business plan that provides information on a company, its products or services, its market, and critical risks to prospective business or marketing partners or to prospective key employees is called an invention plan.
Invention Plan informs prospective business or marketing partners or key employees about the company, product/service, market, and critical risks.
This business plan should briefly explain ones corporation, ones brand, the main aspects of ones market research, ones strategic plan, ones management, and ones financial plan.
Learn more on business plan -
brainly.com/question/15826771
#SPJ4
