Answer:
the deductible loss on the car is $12,000
Explanation:
The computation of the Jim deductible loss on the car is shown below:
Given that
Car value = $40,000
Insurance recovery = 70%
Now the deductible loss is
= Car value - (car value × insurance recovery)
= $40,000 - ($40,000 × 70%)
= $40,000 - $28,000
= $12,000
hence, the deductible loss on the car is $12,000
Traditionally, the formulas used to express a firm's cost of equity are the dividend capitalization model and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM).
Explanation:
Generally, two risk components determine a firm's cost of equity. The first is the systematic risk associated with the broader equity market. All firms are exposed to this risk, and it cannot be mitigated through diversification.
The second risk component is the unsystematic risk associated with the firm in question. This risk, often reflected as beta, a measure of the stock's volatility in relation to the volatility of the broader market, can be mitigated via diversification.
Answer: quid pro quo sexual harassment
Explanation:
The scenario represented in the question regarding Rhonda and her company's chief financial officer is referred to as quid pro quo sexual harassment.
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is a situation that occurs when benefits, pay, employment, position, training, title, position are based on the condition that the other individual involved agree to ones sexual advances. It should be noted that this is illegal.
The variable cost is calculated as -
Sales - Variable cost = Contribution Margin
Given, Contribution Margin = 25 %
Variable cost = 1 - Contribution Margin = 1 - 25 % = 75 %
25 % of Sales = Contribution Margin = $ 400,000
Sales = $ 400,000 ÷ 25 %
Sales = $ 1,600,000
Variable costs = 75% of Sales = 75 % × $ 1,600,000 = $ 1,200,000
Answer:
The answer to both a and b is in the explanation below
Explanation:
a) The increase in wage can either decrease or increase the hours worked. This is became an increase in wage has both substitution effect and income effect that work in different directions. Substitution effect An increase in wage increases the opportunity cost of leisure, thereby making the worker increase number of hours worked. Income effect The increase in wage also makers the worker richer, thereby making the worker decrease number of hours worked.
Since no information about worker's preferences is given, we do not Imow which effect will dominate the other effect and, therefore, we do not know what the net impact of the increase in wage will be.
b) The bonus will only have income effect. The bonus will make the workers richer, thereby making the worker decrease number of hours worked.
If in part a), the substitution effect and income effect are equal in magnitude, then there will be no change in the number of hours worked. The number of hours worked will remain the same at 2000 hours. Since the employer would be paying $5 extra on each hour worked, the cost to the employer of increase in wage would be $10,000 (=2000 x $5), which is the same as the bonus in part b).
