If it’s free then I don’t think they need to determine the price bc it’s free
Answer:
B. The lessor does not have the right to stop delivery in transit due to the lessee's breach of the lease agreement; instead, the lessor must deliver the goods to the lessee in spite of the breach, and then sue the lessee for damages.
Explanation:
During the transit of goods, if the lessor learns of a breach of the lease agreement, he has every right to stop the delivery of the goods in transit by notifying the goods carrier or bailee. Since the carrier of the goods reports directly to the lessor, once he receives instructions from the lessor to stop delivery of goods, and he still has sufficient time, the delivery should be stopped.
Once the goods are reclaimed, the lessor can then decide to sue to recover damages. He can also, decide to cancel the contract at that point
Answer:
The answer is: the following three should be used.
- net present value (NPV)
- traditional payback period (PB)
- the modified internal rate of return (MIRR)
Explanation:
First of all, the NPV of the four projects must be positive. Only NPV positive projects should be financed. If the NPV is negative, the project should be tossed away. This is like a golden rule in investment.
Now comes the "if" part. What does the company value more, a short payback period or a higher rate of return.
If the company values more a shorter payback period (usually high tech companies do this due to obsolescence), then they should choose the project with the shortest payback period.
If the company isn't that concerned about payback periods, then it should choose to finance the project with the highest modified rate of return. This means that the most profitable project should be financed.
Answer:
Agricultural specialists research farms and crops, collect data, and help farmers implement the best industry practices available. As an agricultural specialist, you also take the time to evaluate farmlands, cultivate relationships with others in the industry, and support land conservation efforts.
Answer:
Dean probably will be able to get the painting back. A mutual mistake was made since both parties involved, Dean and Susan, made an important factual error. They both were convinced that the painting was an ordinary copy and that it was worth very little money. A mutual mistake makes the contract voidable by any party.