Answer:
Fourth amendment
Explanation:
The Department of Justice wants access to the telephone records of a major newspaper. The requirement for a search warrant (an order from a judge authorizing the search of the records) would be required under the <u>fourth amendment</u>.
The fourth amendment rights guarantees Americans the right to be secure in their homes and properties and protects them against unreasonable searches and seizures of properties by the police or any other government agency without probable cause or valid reasons. For a judge to issue a search warrant, there must be sufficient reason or probable clause else the affected individual can sue for a breach of his or her fourth amendment rights.
Answer:
I'm here, I think I'm just gonna get that 31 points
In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
I would probably say that i was in gym class in 7th grade and i tripped in front of my crush and his friends HHAHA anyways thank you, have a good day too :)
Answer:
- Allowed unless the state association has prohibited such equipment.
Explanation:
As per the question, the game officials are 'allowed to use the headset communication equipment' during a match until the use of such equipment is not restricted or prohibited by the state or sports association. In the given example, the game officials were witnessed using the equipment to communicate with each other as they were allowed to use it for important discussion or decision. However, if such equipment are being used after prohibition the officials may be subject penalty or other fatal consequences.
