Answer and Explanation:
America really wanted to expand to spread freedom and was committed to that goal, but that commitment encompassed the freedom of Americans alone, as America became involved with imperialist and oppressive concepts towards other peoples during its expansion.
The Americans based themselves on the idea that it was a divine obligation for them to dominate new lands, however, this domination was done without any regard for the people who already inhabited those lands, which caused the American government to invade, exploit and limit the freedom. These are factors that the Americans criticized in their territory, but used in their imperialist campaigns, becoming as tyrannical as the British system that got rid of.
<span>Voters should be informed of all the active and political process because any mistakes on the vote lead to chaos. When voters are informed about the issues and goals of candidates they can decide who fits their ideal leader.
Example- I voted for the first time last year and had no idea who to vote for. The only person i knew not to vote for congress.</span>
The first two options, NATO and League of Nations are not processes, but organizations, so they can't be the correct answer.
Then, there isn't really a "Multinational Government", except if you call the EU structure like this (but not the official name).
The correct answer is : globalization, it's the process by which societies become integrated.
<span />
Answer:
Panama has a major trade route through the Panama canal, and they are the leaders in major natural gas trade. Panama connects North and South America. It also controls the efficiency of most trade, because most ships travel quicker through it's canal. On the opposite opinion, I think Panama is very important to the whole world! :)
Answer: I would contend that the right answer is the C) whether or not student-athletes are students who participate in sports, or athletes who may also go to class.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that Christopher Saffici and Robert Pellegrino wrote their article in 2012 with the title "Intercollegiate athletics vs. academics: the student-athlete or the athlete-student." Their main argument is that the students who are accepted in colleges due to their athletic skills often are not prepared to do well academically while meeting the expectations and demands as athletes, so, in turn, they are given preferential treatment in school, and they are overworked, becoming more athletes that go to college (without truly succeeding academically, as they are supposed to), that students who are also athletes.
In fact, they say that "It is not a question of whether or not the experience for a student-athlete is different from that of a traditional student. Instead, the issue at hand here is whether or not student-athletes are students that participate in extracurricular competitive sports, or have become athletes that also go to classes whenever their athletic schedules allow."
