Answer:
Circumstantial evidence, in the context of law, means evidence that can only be proven through the support of another fact.
Explanation:
In other words, the evidence cannot stand on its own. In the context of the example, for example, it would be that the bus driver was found guilty of murder since his fingerprints were found in the scene of the crime.
However, his fingerprints alone do not tell us who is the culprit of the murder - it's possible that his fingerprints were there because he and the murder victims were close friends, and thus his fingerprints can be found all over the apartment.
When relying merely on circumstantial evidence (such as one previously exemplified), it is possible that the evidence is misattributed. A piece of stronger evidence would be direct ones, for example, if the murder weapon was found on him, or if there were eyewitness report showing that he was at the scene of the crime when it occurred.
<span> because of the repetition and passion of the words. </span>
This is the best I could find for you
Answer:
Write the following sentences and give the function of each underlined word.
a. Yellow describes snake and crawled tells of an action.
b. Shoaib is the name of a person and large describes the company.
c. Tap is the name of a thing; yesterday tells when it was leaking (helps describe the action).
d. Me stands in place of a noun (the person speaking) and morning is the name given to the early
part of the day.
e. And joins two parts of the sentence; are fed tells of an action (continuing).
f. Saw tells of a past action; in shows the relationship between peacock and forest.
g. Oh! Shows a feeling or emotion; new describes the car.
Explanation:
Plzzzzzzz give 5 stars it took me time to look at the answer for this question
