Answer:
Company should continue with old machine (Alternative 1)
Explanation:
Preparation of a differential analysis dated April 11 on whether to continue with the old machine (Alternative 1) or replace the old machine (Alternative 2)
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Continue with old machine(Alternative 1) ; Replace with old machine(Alternative 2); Differential effect on income
REVENUES
Proceeds from sale of machine
$0 $50500 $50500
COSTS
Purchase price $0 -$75000 -$75000
Direct labor -$56000 -$37000 19000
(11200*5 = -56000)
(7400*5 = -37000)
Income (loss) -$56000 -$61500 -$5500
Based on the above differential analysis the Company should continue with OLD MACHINE (Alternative 1)
When a manufacturer saturates the market, the manufacturer is engaging in intensive distribution.
Intensive distribution can be define as the way in which companies or manufacturer made available or distribute their products from retail outlet to wholesaler outlet.
Most companies use intensive distribution marketing strategy to increase sales and to sell out the products in their warehouse so as to restock or restore new products.
Intensive distribution help to create product awareness to those people that are not aware of the products due to the fact that the products can be find everywhere.
Inconclusion the manufacturer is engaging in intensive distribution.
Learn more about intensive distribution here:
brainly.com/question/24250512
The answer is option B. The main challenge of career planning in changing times is that you need to revise your plans often.
The world we live in is dynamic. New inventions, new technology, new methods of doing things always come up with time.
Because of this, when making a career plan, one must be fully aware that the process is not static. That is, changes would occur and as such, you have to revise your plans often so that it is in line with what is obtainable at the time.
<em>Read more on career planning here: brainly.com/question/6457203?referrer=searchResults</em>
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
Macroeconomics is the study of the economy as a whole, unlike microeconomics which is the study of the individual firms/markets.
Macroeconomics focuses on the standard of living, unemployment rate, inflation rate etc. and how this affects the whole economy.
Option A is wrong because it is the microeconomics and not macroeconomics that studies the market and the firm.
Option B and D are wrong because these are for microeconomics
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Susan:
Annual deposit= $5,000 for 10 years
Lumo-sum for 30 years
Interest rate= 8.5%
Jane:
Annual deposit= $5,000 for 30 years.
<u>First, we will calculate the future value of Susan:</u>
<u></u>
First 10 years:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {5,000*[(1.085^10)-1]}/0.085
FV= $74,175.50
Last 30 years:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 74,175.50*(1.085^30)
FV= $857,050.14
<u>Jane:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {5,000*[(1.085^30)-1]}/0.085
FV= $621,073.63
<u>Earnings difference= 857,050.14 - 621,073.63= $235,976.51 in favor of Susan.</u>
