Answer:
If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.
Explanation:
Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.
The Republican Party or <em>Grand Old Party</em> stood against the extension of slavery to the country´s new territories and aimed for the complete abolition of slavery in the country during the 19th century. During the 20th century, they stood for the policy of the minimum interference by the government in economic affairs or "laissez-faire".
The Democratic Party supported slavery and opposed to civil rights reforms during the 19th century. During the 20th century, it had a major change in its ideology during the 20th century, as it shifted to the support of organized labor movements and the civil rights of minority populations.
What the vast majority of colonists wanted from Great Britain is for the right to influence the political decisions regarding the colonies due to the fact that they were taxpayers. They also wanted more fair tax impositions as the ones that were imposed at the time were considered too excessive. However, as it was demonstrated in the civil war, there was a great division regarding the abolition of slavery and civil rights. In conclusion, the representation of what the country became after the independence did not entirely match what the population of the States as a whole envisioned.
Answer:
According to the philosopher Dewis the subjective perceptions of the world around and how it develops differs according to every individual experiences from the past,
Explanation:
According to the philosopher Dewis the subjective perceptions of the world around and how it develops differs according to every individual experiences from the past, he explains how education can be perceived in a very different way while students are under the same situation and environment; nevertheless, the information is analyzed in a really different way taking into account experience, continuity and interactions of such individuals from their background. Dewis makes this reflection taking into account Heidegger’s conception about existence as a “phenomenon to the future”, he explains how he believes in “the truth of being”. However, Heidegger finds a problem when talking about the truth for human beings since it would be hard to know exactly if there is possible to find an objective truth. On the other hand, Husserl (Heidegger’s mentor) explains consciousness as a complex state in which it is necessary to analyze not only the inner state of the being but also the historical background for such result.
Oligarchy
I think because they are a small group that rules a country
